Department of Health Service Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Statistics and Mathematics, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 May 21;3(1):17-22. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.50. eCollection 2014 Jun.
Many countries conduct Health Impact Assessment (HIA) of their projects and policies to predict their positive and negative health impacts. In recent years many guides have been developed to inform HIA practice, largely reflecting local developments in HIA. These guides have often been designed for specific contexts and specific need, making the choice between guides difficult. The objective of the current study is to identify underlying principles in order to guide HIA practice in Iran.
This study was conducted in three stages: 1) Studies comparing HIA guidelines were reviewed to identify criteria used for comparison seeking emphasized principles. 2) The HIA characteristics extracted from published papers were categorized in order to determine the principles that could guide HIA practice. 3) Finally, these principles were agreed by experts using nominal group technique.
The review of the studies comparing HIA guides demonstrated there are no clear comparison criteria for reviewing HIA guides and no study mentioned HIA principles. Investigating the HIA principles from peer-reviewed papers, we found 14 issues. These were, considering of general features in planning and conducting HIAs such as HIA stream, level, timing and type, considering of the wider socio-political and economic context, considering of economic, technical and legal aspects of HIA and capacities for HIA, rationality and comprehensiveness, using appropriate evidence, elaborating on HIA relation to other forms of Impact Assessment, considering of equity, and encouraging intersectoral and interdisciplinary cooperation, involvement of stakeholders and transparency as underlying principles to guide HIA practice. The results emphasize how critical these technical as well as tactical considerations are in the early scoping step of an HIA which plans the conduct of the HIA in reponse to local contextual issues.
Determining the principles of HIA from peer-reviewed papers provides an opportunity for guiding HIA practice comprehensively. It seems to be feasible to develop a universal guide that covers all principles required.
许多国家对其项目和政策进行健康影响评估(HIA),以预测其对健康的积极和消极影响。近年来,为了指导 HIA 实践,制定了许多指南,这些指南主要反映了 HIA 在当地的发展。这些指南通常是为特定的背景和特定的需求而设计的,因此很难在指南之间做出选择。本研究的目的是确定指导伊朗 HIA 实践的基本原则。
本研究分三个阶段进行:1)对比较 HIA 指南的研究进行综述,以确定用于比较的标准,寻找强调的原则。2)从已发表的论文中提取 HIA 特征,对其进行分类,以确定可指导 HIA 实践的原则。3)最后,通过名义群体技术让专家对这些原则达成一致意见。
对比较 HIA 指南的研究进行综述表明,目前没有明确的 HIA 指南审查标准,也没有研究提到 HIA 原则。从同行评议的论文中研究 HIA 原则,我们发现了 14 个问题。这些问题包括在进行 HIA 时考虑 HIA 流、水平、时间和类型等一般特征,考虑更广泛的社会政治和经济背景,考虑 HIA 的经济、技术和法律方面以及 HIA 的能力,合理性和全面性,使用适当的证据,详细说明 HIA 与其他形式的影响评估的关系,考虑公平性,并鼓励部门间和跨学科合作,利益相关者的参与和透明度作为指导 HIA 实践的基本原则。研究结果强调了这些技术和战术考虑在 HIA 的早期范围界定阶段的重要性,该阶段根据当地的背景问题规划 HIA 的实施。
从同行评议的论文中确定 HIA 的原则为全面指导 HIA 实践提供了机会。似乎有可能制定涵盖所有必要原则的通用指南。