Spetz A C, Hammar M, Lindberg B, Spångberg A, Varenhorst E
Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Linköping, Sweden.
J Urol. 2001 Aug;166(2):517-20.
We evaluated the incidence and frequency of, and distress due to hot flashes after castration therapy with polyestradiol phosphate and complete androgen ablation.
A total of 915 men with metastatic prostate carcinoma enrolled in the Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group-5 trial study were randomized to intramuscular injections of 240 mg. Polyestradiol phosphate every 2 weeks for 8 weeks followed by monthly subcutaneous injections or complete androgen ablation, that is bilateral orchiectomy or 3.75 mg. of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog triptorelin monthly combined with 250 mg. of the antiandrogen flutamide 3 times daily. The incidence and frequency of, and distress due to hot flashes were recorded at regular intervals using a questionnaire.
Of the 915 men 901 were evaluated at a median followup of 18.5 months. The incidence of hot flashes was 30.1% and 74.3% in the polyestradiol phosphate and complete androgen ablation groups, respectively (p <0.001). In the polyestradiol phosphate group the frequency of and distress due to hot flashes were significantly lower than in the androgen ablation group. There was complete relief from hot flashes in 50% of the men on polyestradiol phosphate during followup compared with none on androgen ablation. The incidence of hot flashes did not differ in men with and without tumor progression.
Endocrine treatment with polyestradiol phosphate induced fewer and less distressing hot flashes than complete androgen ablation. Flashes also disappeared to a greater extent during polyestradiol phosphate than during androgen ablation. The data in this study enable us to provide thorough individual information to patients on the risk and grade of expected distress and duration of hot flashes during polyestradiol phosphate or complete androgen ablation treatment.
我们评估了磷酸聚雌二醇去势治疗及完全雄激素阻断后潮热的发生率、发作频率及由此产生的困扰。
共有915例转移性前列腺癌男性患者参与了斯堪的纳维亚前列腺癌研究组-5试验,随机分为两组,一组每2周肌肉注射240mg磷酸聚雌二醇,共8周,之后每月皮下注射;另一组进行完全雄激素阻断,即双侧睾丸切除术或每月注射3.75mg促性腺激素释放激素类似物曲普瑞林,同时每日3次口服250mg抗雄激素药物氟他胺。通过问卷调查定期记录潮热的发生率、发作频率及由此产生的困扰。
915例患者中,901例在中位随访18.5个月时接受了评估。磷酸聚雌二醇组和完全雄激素阻断组潮热的发生率分别为30.1%和74.3%(p<0.001)。磷酸聚雌二醇组潮热的发作频率及由此产生的困扰明显低于雄激素阻断组。随访期间,磷酸聚雌二醇组50%的男性潮热完全缓解,而雄激素阻断组无一人缓解。有无肿瘤进展的男性潮热发生率无差异。
与完全雄激素阻断相比,磷酸聚雌二醇内分泌治疗引起的潮热次数更少,困扰更小。与雄激素阻断相比,磷酸聚雌二醇治疗期间潮热消失的程度也更大。本研究的数据使我们能够为患者提供关于磷酸聚雌二醇或完全雄激素阻断治疗期间潮热预期困扰风险、程度及持续时间的全面个体化信息。