Suppr超能文献

使用促黄体生成素释放激素激动剂联合甾体或非甾体抗雄激素药物进行雄激素剥夺治疗前列腺癌期间出现的潮热。

Hot flashes during androgen deprivation therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist combined with steroidal or nonsteroidal antiandrogen for prostate cancer.

作者信息

Sakai Hideki, Igawa Tsukasa, Tsurusaki Toshifumi, Yura Morishi, Kusaba Yasuyuki, Hayashi Mikio, Iwasaki Shotaro, Hakariya Hironobu, Hara Tanetoshi, Kanetake Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

Urology. 2009 Mar;73(3):635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.013. Epub 2008 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate hot flashes and quality of life during combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy using steroidal or nonsteroidal antiandrogens.

METHODS

A total of 151 patients with prostate cancer, who were enrolled into this study from May 2001 to June 2003, were randomized to receive CAB therapy using a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (leuprorelin) combined with a steroidal antiandrogen (chlormadinone) or a nonsteroidal antiandrogen (bicalutamide). The incidence of, frequency of, and distress due to hot flashes were evaluated with a self-administered questionnaire during a 2-year period. The general and disease-specific quality-of-life outcomes were also measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate questionnaire.

RESULTS

Data were available for analysis from 124 patients. Although the incidence of hot flashes largely tended to be greater in the bicalutamide group than in the chlormadinone group, no significant difference was noted in the cumulative incidence of hot flashes at 2 years. The median frequency of hot flashes daily was 1.3 and 2.2 for warmth/flushing (P = .16) and 1.0 and 3.6 for sweating (P = .021) in the chlormadinone and bicalutamide groups, respectively. Patients in the chlormadinone group were significantly less likely to be distressed by warmth/flushing (odds ratio 0.47, P < .001) and sweating (odds ratio 0.61, P = .01) than were those in the bicalutamide group. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate scores over time showed no intergroup differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that CAB using a steroidal antiandrogen such as chlormadinone might induce fewer and less-distressing hot flashes than CAB with bicalutamide.

摘要

目的

研究使用甾体类或非甾体类抗雄激素药物进行联合雄激素阻断(CAB)治疗期间的潮热及生活质量。

方法

2001年5月至2003年6月共纳入151例前列腺癌患者,随机接受使用促黄体生成素释放激素激动剂(亮丙瑞林)联合甾体类抗雄激素药物(氯地孕酮)或非甾体类抗雄激素药物(比卡鲁胺)的CAB治疗。在2年期间,通过自我填写问卷评估潮热的发生率、频率及相关困扰。还使用癌症治疗功能评估-前列腺问卷测量总体及疾病特异性生活质量结果。

结果

124例患者的数据可供分析。虽然比卡鲁胺组潮热的发生率总体上倾向于高于氯地孕酮组,但2年时潮热的累积发生率无显著差异。氯地孕酮组和比卡鲁胺组每日潮热的中位频率分别为:温热/潮红1.3次和2.2次(P = 0.16),出汗1.0次和3.6次(P = 0.021)。氯地孕酮组患者因温热/潮红(优势比0.47,P < 0.001)和出汗(优势比0.61,P = 0.01)而感到困扰的可能性明显低于比卡鲁胺组。随时间推移,癌症治疗功能评估-前列腺评分显示组间无差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,与使用比卡鲁胺进行CAB治疗相比,使用氯地孕酮等甾体类抗雄激素药物进行CAB治疗可能引起的潮热更少且困扰更小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验