Crutch S J, Warrington E K
Dementia Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurology, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Brain. 2001 Aug;124(Pt 8):1533-43. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.8.1533.
We investigated the case of a patient whose reading was characterized by multiple phonemic paraphasic errors. An error analysis of a large corpus of reading responses (758 words, 86 non-words) highlighted the preponderance of phonological errors which did not occur in his naming, repetition or spontaneous speech. His comprehension of the written word was relatively preserved, even for words he was unable to read aloud. We suggest that his impairment lies at the level of the phonological output store. We also demonstrate that his reading performance was facilitated by increasing the response-stimulus delay. The strong influence of temporal factors is shown to be task-specific. Two main points are drawn from our results. First, we argue that our patient can be characterized as having a refractory access type of deficit; to our knowledge, no previous case of a refractory deficit affecting word reading has been reported. Secondly, the task specificity of both the phonological error pattern and the sensitivity to temporal factors is difficult to reconcile with the idea of a unitary phonological output store. Contrary to orthodox neuropsychological models, we propose that there are independent stores specific for reading and spoken output.
我们研究了一位患者的病例,其阅读表现为存在多个音素性错语错误。对大量阅读反应语料库(758个单词,86个非单词)的错误分析突出了语音错误的优势,这些错误在他的命名、复述或自发言语中并未出现。他对书面单词的理解相对保留,即使是对于他无法大声读出的单词。我们认为他的损伤位于语音输出存储层面。我们还证明,通过增加反应 - 刺激延迟,他的阅读表现得到了促进。时间因素的强烈影响被证明是特定于任务的。我们的研究结果得出两个主要观点。首先,我们认为我们的患者可被表征为具有难治性通路类型的缺陷;据我们所知,此前尚未有影响单词阅读的难治性缺陷病例的报道。其次,语音错误模式和对时间因素的敏感性的任务特异性很难与单一语音输出存储的观点相协调。与传统神经心理学模型相反,我们提出存在分别针对阅读和口语输出的独立存储。