Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, 50 Township Line Rd., Elkins Park, PA 19027, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(10):1848-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
Repeating a word can have both facilitative and inhibitory effects on subsequent processing. The present study investigated these dynamics by examining the facilitative and inhibitory consequences of different kinds of item repetition in two individuals with aphasia and a group of neurologically intact control participants. The two individuals with aphasia were matched on overall aphasia severity, but had deficits at different levels of processing: one with a phonological deficit and spared semantic processing, the other with a semantic deficit and spared phonological processing. Participants completed a spoken word-to-picture matching task in which they had to pick which of four object images matched the spoken word. The trials were grouped into pairs such that exactly two objects from the first trial in a pair were present on screen during the second trial in the pair. When the second trial's target was the same as the first trial's target, compared to control participants, both participants with aphasia exhibited equally larger repetition priming effects. When the second trial's target was one of the new items, the participant with a phonological deficit exhibited a significantly more negative effect (i.e., second trial response slower than first trial response) than the control participants and the participant with a semantic deficit. Simulations of a computational model confirmed that this pattern of results could arise from (1) normal residual activation being functionally more significant when overall lexical processing is slower and (2) residual phonological activation of the previous trial's target having a particularly strong inhibitory effect specifically when phonological processing is impaired because the task was phonologically-driven (the spoken input specified the target). These results provide new insights into perseveration errors and lexical access deficits in aphasia.
重复一个词会对后续的处理产生促进和抑制作用。本研究通过考察两种失语症患者和一组神经正常的对照组参与者在不同类型项目重复中的促进和抑制后果,研究了这些动态。这两种失语症患者在总体失语症严重程度上相匹配,但在不同的加工水平上存在缺陷:一个是语音缺陷,语义处理正常,另一个是语义缺陷,语音处理正常。参与者完成了一项口语单词到图片匹配任务,他们必须从四个物体图像中选择与口语单词匹配的图像。试验被分为对,使得在一对中的第一试验的屏幕上同时出现两个物体。当第二试验的目标与第一试验的目标相同时,与对照组参与者相比,两个失语症患者都表现出同样更大的重复启动效应。当第二试验的目标是新的项目之一时,语音缺陷的参与者表现出比对照组参与者和语义缺陷的参与者更显著的负效应(即,第二试验的反应比第一试验的反应慢)。计算模型的模拟证实,这种结果模式可能源于:(1)当整体词汇处理较慢时,正常的剩余激活在功能上更为重要;(2)由于任务是语音驱动的(输入的语音指定了目标),因此前一个试验的目标的剩余语音激活具有特别强的抑制作用,特别是当语音处理受损时。这些结果为失语症中的持续错误和词汇访问缺陷提供了新的见解。