Bradford J, Honnold J, Rives M E, Hafford K
Survey and Evaluation Research Laboratory, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
AIDS Public Policy J. 2000 Spring;15(1):29-42.
The authors sought to determine the following: (1) How rigorous are the current resource allocation methods used by Virginia's five regional Ryan White CARE (Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency) Act Title II consortia? (2) How useful are existing databases in allocating resources? (3) Is it feasible to introduce a standardized performance measurement approach for state-level assessment of consortia effectiveness? The authors reviewed proposals and progress reports from each of the consortia to the Virginia public health agency; they then visited each of the consortia to solicit information to refine the study questions and to review the consortia's databases. The authors reviewed the literature on existing models used to allocate resources, and surveyed members of the Virginia consortia about how they used various resource allocation tools, how effective these tools were, and how ready the consortia were to be evaluated regarding resource allocation. The authors found no uniform process for the allocation of Title II funds in Virginia. Consortia members who felt connected and involved with their consortium were significantly more knowledgeable about its operations and more likely to consider it effective. A consortium's use of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) approach to allocating resources was strongly associated with its members' perception that the consortium was effective. Statewide performance and/or outcome measures cannot be set without some standardized expectations for performance. To do this, some expectations for basic resource allocation procedures must be established. Three of Virginia's five consortia will make use of this study's instrumentation in their next resource allocation processes, and, if their experiences are useful, a statewide process may be established. If a statewide process is established, regional consortia must continue to be able to determine local needs and to respond with locally appropriate service planning.
(1)弗吉尼亚州五个地区的瑞安·怀特关怀(全面艾滋病资源紧急情况)法案第二章联盟目前使用的资源分配方法有多严格?(2)现有数据库在资源分配中实用性如何?(3)引入标准化绩效评估方法以对联盟有效性进行州级评估是否可行?作者查阅了各联盟提交给弗吉尼亚公共卫生机构的提案和进展报告;随后走访了每个联盟,以获取信息来完善研究问题并审查联盟的数据库。作者查阅了关于现有资源分配模型的文献,并就弗吉尼亚联盟成员如何使用各种资源分配工具、这些工具的有效性如何以及联盟在资源分配方面接受评估的准备程度进行了调查。作者发现弗吉尼亚州在第二章资金分配方面没有统一的流程。感觉与联盟有联系并参与其中的联盟成员对联盟运作的了解明显更多,也更有可能认为其有效。联盟采用持续质量改进(CQI)方法进行资源分配与其成员认为联盟有效的看法密切相关。如果没有一些标准化的绩效期望,就无法设定全州范围的绩效和/或成果衡量标准。要做到这一点,必须对基本资源分配程序设定一些期望。弗吉尼亚州五个联盟中的三个将在其下一次资源分配过程中使用本研究的手段,如果它们的经验有用,可能会建立一个全州范围的流程。如果建立了全州范围的流程,地区联盟必须继续能够确定当地需求,并通过适合当地的服务规划做出回应。