• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然环境下主观概率判断的校准

Calibration of Subjective Probability Judgments in a Naturalistic Setting.

作者信息

Johnson Johnnie E. V., Bruce Alistair C.

机构信息

Center for Risk Research, University of Southampton, United Kingdom

出版信息

Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jul;85(2):265-290. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2949.

DOI:10.1006/obhd.2000.2949
PMID:11461202
Abstract

Results of previous calibration studies are used to identify features of the decision maker and the decision environment which might be expected to result in good calibration. Racetrack bettors and, in particular, the UK parimutuel betting market are identified as possessing such characteristics. In order to explore calibration in this setting, an analysis is undertaken of bets placed on 19,396 horses. A close correlation is observed between the subjective probability judgments of horses' success, implicit in the bettors' wagering activities, and the objective probability of success of the horses concerned. Explanations for the results are offered in terms of characteristics of racetrack bettors and the naturalistic setting, with particular reference to the operation of the betting market. The results contribute to an emergent school of thought which advocates naturalistic enquiry as a complement to laboratory-based experiments in further developing the understanding of decision making. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

摘要

以往校准研究的结果用于识别决策者和决策环境的特征,这些特征可能会带来良好的校准效果。赛马投注者,尤其是英国的赛马总投注市场被认为具有这些特征。为了探究这种情况下的校准情况,对19396匹马的投注进行了分析。在投注者的投注活动中隐含的马匹获胜主观概率判断与相关马匹获胜的客观概率之间观察到密切的相关性。根据赛马投注者的特征和自然环境对结果进行了解释,特别提到了投注市场的运作。这些结果为一个新兴的思想流派做出了贡献,该流派主张将自然主义探究作为对基于实验室的实验的补充,以进一步加深对决策的理解。版权所有2001学术出版社。

相似文献

1
Calibration of Subjective Probability Judgments in a Naturalistic Setting.自然环境下主观概率判断的校准
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jul;85(2):265-290. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2949.
2
The ethics of parimutuel systems.博彩系统的伦理问题。
J Gambl Stud. 1992 Dec;8(4):371-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01024124.
3
Where's the Bonus in Bonus Bets? Assessing Sports Bettors' Comprehension of their True Cost.博彩红利中的“红利”在哪里?评估体育博彩者对真实成本的理解。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):587-599. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9800-0.
4
Sports betting: can gamblers beat randomness?体育博彩:赌徒能战胜随机性吗?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2004 Jun;18(2):143-7. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.18.2.143.
5
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
6
An empirical study of the impact of complexity on participation in horserace betting.复杂性对参与赛马博彩影响的实证研究。
J Gambl Stud. 1997 Summer;13(2):159-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1024903418798.
7
Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment: part 2. Calibration of expert judgments about personal exposures to benzene.暴露评估中专家判断的应用:第2部分。关于个人苯暴露的专家判断校准。
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2003 Jan;13(1):1-16. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500253.
8
Comparing football bettors' response to social media marketing differing in bet complexity and account type - An experimental study.比较足球投注者对不同投注复杂性和账户类型的社交媒体营销的反应——一项实验研究。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Sep 26;10(3):388-95. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00056.
9
Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.敌友之间:社会决策中内隐可信度判断的影响
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):796-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
10
The effects of control on betting: paradoxical betting on items of high confidence with low value.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Jul;29(4):598-610. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.598.

引用本文的文献

1
The Importance of Calibration in Clinical Psychology.校准在临床心理学中的重要性。
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):840-854. doi: 10.1177/1073191117752055. Epub 2018 Feb 19.