Liu H Y, Wenzel-Seifert K, Seifert R
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
J Neurochem. 2001 Jul;78(2):325-38. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00422.x.
The olfactory G protein G(alphaolf) differs from the short splice variant of G(salpha) (G(salphaS)) in 80 amino acids, but little is known about biochemical differences between G(alphaolf) and G(salphaS). We addressed this question by analyzing fusion proteins of the beta2-adrenoceptor (beta2AR) and G(alphaolf) and G(salphaS), respectively, using Sf9 insect cells as expression system. The fusion ensured defined receptor/G protein stoichiometry and efficient coupling. High-affinity agonist binding studies showed that G(alphaolf) possesses a lower GDP-affinity than G(salphaS) As a result, the agonist-free beta2AR and the beta2AR occupied by partial agonists were more efficient at promoting GDP-dissociation from G(alphaolf) than from G(salphaS) a assessed by guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) binding, adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity and GTP hydrolysis. Basal AC activity in the absence of GTP was almost sixfold lower in membranes expressing beta2AR-G(alphaolf) than in membranes expressing beta2AR-G(salphaS) at similar levels, reflecting the lower abundance of G(alphaolf-GDP) relative to G(salphaS-GDP). The maximum agonist-stimulated AC activity with beta2AR-G(salphaS) was more than twofold higher than with beta2AR-G(alphaolf), but the relative agonist-stimulation of AC with beta2AR-G(alphaolf) was much greater than with beta2AR-G(salphaS). The difference in maximum AC activity can be explained by more rapid deactivation of G(alphaolf-GTP) by GTP hydrolysis and GTP dissociation relative to G(salphaS-GTP). Taken together, there are biochemical differences between G(alphaolf) and G(salphaS), supporting different roles of these G proteins in vivo.
嗅觉G蛋白G(αolf)与G(sα)的短剪接变体G(sαS)在80个氨基酸上存在差异,但关于G(αolf)和G(sαS)之间的生化差异却知之甚少。我们通过分别分析β2肾上腺素能受体(β2AR)与G(αolf)和G(sαS)的融合蛋白来解决这个问题,使用Sf9昆虫细胞作为表达系统。这种融合确保了明确的受体/G蛋白化学计量比和有效的偶联。高亲和力激动剂结合研究表明,G(αolf)的GDP亲和力低于G(sαS)。因此,无激动剂的β2AR和被部分激动剂占据的β2AR在促进GDP从G(αolf)解离方面比从G(sαS)解离更有效,这通过鸟苷5'-O-(3-硫代三磷酸)结合、腺苷酸环化酶(AC)活性和GTP水解来评估。在不存在GTP的情况下,表达β2AR-G(αolf)的膜中的基础AC活性比表达β2AR-G(sαS)且水平相似的膜中低近六倍,这反映了相对于G(sαS-GDP),G(αolf-GDP)的丰度较低。β2AR-G(sαS)的最大激动剂刺激的AC活性比β2AR-G(αolf)高两倍多,但β2AR-G(αolf)对AC的相对激动剂刺激比β2AR-G(sαS)大得多。最大AC活性的差异可以通过相对于G(sαS-GTP),G(αolf-GTP)通过GTP水解和GTP解离更快失活来解释。综上所述,G(αolf)和G(sαS)之间存在生化差异,支持这些G蛋白在体内发挥不同作用。