Brunner H, Miksch H, Sziegoleit D
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1975;230(4):458-60.
To compare the tube agglutination test and the microtiter plate agglutination procedure, 207 human sera were tested for agglutinins to Salmonella and 267 sera for agglutinins to Brucella by both methods. A positive reaction in the microtiter test was indicated by a smooth or irregular mat shape at the bottom of each well in the microtiter plate, whereas a negative reaction was shown by a settling of the antigen to a button shape. As can be seen in table 1, identical titer or only one dilution difference between both tests were found in more than 93% of the samples tested. The plate test was easier to perform and saved time, space, antigen and serum. The microtiter-agglutination technique can, therefore, be recommended for the routine laboratory for serology.
为比较试管凝集试验和微量滴定板凝集试验,用这两种方法对207份人血清进行了沙门氏菌凝集素检测,对267份血清进行了布鲁氏菌凝集素检测。微量滴定试验中的阳性反应表现为微量滴定板各孔底部出现光滑或不规则的毡状形态,而阴性反应则表现为抗原沉降成纽扣状。如表1所示,在超过93%的检测样本中,两种试验的效价相同或仅相差一个稀释度。平板试验操作更简便,节省时间、空间、抗原和血清。因此,微量滴定凝集技术可推荐用于血清学常规实验室。