Passman C, McGwin G, Taylor A J, Rue III L W
Center for Injury Sciences, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Trauma. 2001 Jul;51(1):105-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200107000-00017.
Motor vehicle crashes cause significant morbidity and mortality annually. Seat belt use has partially been associated with a decreased risk of morbidity and mortality among those involved in motor vehicle crashes. Persons injured in motor vehicle crashes and not wearing seat belts have an increased risk of admission to trauma centers for motor vehicle crash-related injury. The purpose of this study was to measure changes in seat belt use after discharge among patients admitted to a Level I trauma center for injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes.
Patients admitted to a Level I trauma center for injuries sustained in motor vehicle crashes during 1998 were eligible for participation. A telephone interview was conducted with a random sample of 136 eligible patients regarding patterns of seat belt use before and after their collision. Demographic data and clinical characteristics were also collected. The frequency of seat belt use before and after crash involvement was compared for all patients and stratified by age, gender, race, and Injury Severity Score (ISS).
Slightly over half (54%) of patients reported "always" wearing a seat belt before their collision compared with 85% afterward. Younger age groups, male subjects, and whites had the largest increases in the frequency of seat belt use after collision (45%, 37%, and 44% increases, respectively). With respect to injury severity, the largest increase in the frequency of seat belt use was among those with ISS of 15 to 25 (82% increase). Significant concordance between patient- and emergency medical service-reported use of seat belts was observed. Among subjects reported by emergency medical service personnel to have been restrained, nearly 90% reported belt use at the time of the telephone interview. The most frequently cited occasion for failure to use seat belts (30%) was when taking short trips. Other reported reasons were forgetting to fasten belts (29%), discomfort (10%), being in a rush (8%), riding in the back seat (4%), and that seat belts were unnecessary when riding with a good driver (3%).
Involvement in a motor vehicle crash results in increased seat belt use. Prevention efforts should be directed toward those patients who report infrequent use. Patient "converts" to seat belt use after collisions may be useful in public awareness and prevention campaigns.
机动车碰撞每年都会导致严重的发病和死亡情况。使用安全带在一定程度上与降低机动车碰撞事故中相关人员的发病和死亡风险有关。在机动车碰撞事故中受伤且未系安全带的人员因与机动车碰撞相关的损伤而被送入创伤中心的风险更高。本研究的目的是测量因机动车碰撞受伤而入住一级创伤中心的患者出院后安全带使用情况的变化。
1998年因机动车碰撞受伤而入住一级创伤中心的患者符合参与条件。对136名符合条件的患者进行随机抽样电话访谈,询问他们碰撞前后的安全带使用模式。还收集了人口统计学数据和临床特征。比较了所有患者碰撞前后安全带的使用频率,并按年龄、性别、种族和损伤严重程度评分(ISS)进行分层。
略超过一半(54%)的患者报告在碰撞前“总是”系安全带,而碰撞后这一比例为85%。较年轻年龄组、男性和白人在碰撞后安全带使用频率的增加幅度最大(分别增加45%、37%和44%)。就损伤严重程度而言,ISS为15至25的患者安全带使用频率增加幅度最大(增加82%)。观察到患者报告的安全带使用情况与紧急医疗服务报告的情况之间存在显著一致性。在紧急医疗服务人员报告系了安全带的受试者中,近90%在电话访谈时报告使用了安全带。最常被提及的未使用安全带的情况(30%)是短途出行时。其他报告的原因包括忘记系安全带(29%)、不舒服(10%)、匆忙(8%)、坐在后排(4%)以及与好司机一起乘车时认为安全带不必要(3%)。
经历机动车碰撞会导致安全带使用增加。预防工作应针对那些报告很少使用安全带的患者。碰撞后转变为使用安全带的患者可能对公众意识和预防宣传活动有用。