Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Casarini M, Falagiani P
Ambulatorio di Allergologia, Ospedale Caduti Bollatesi, Bollate, MI, Italy.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Jul;87(1):68-71. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62326-5.
Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are the major allergens in patients sensitive to Rosaceae (apple, peach, apricot, cherry, plum, and pear) who are not allergic to birch pollen.
The purpose of this study was to find a sensitive, specific, and relatively easy method for detection of LTP-sensitive patients.
We studied 36 persons who experienced oral allergy syndrome after the ingestion of fruits in the family Rosaceae. This study cohort was divided into two groups: 18 without allergy to birch pollen (patients) and 18 with birch pollen allergy (control subjects). All were tested by skin prick tests (SPTs) with fresh Golden Delicious apple, fresh peach, and extracts of peel and pulp from both fruits. Their specific IgE reactivities against peach peel extract were further investigated by immunoblot analysis.
All 18 subjects in the control group showed strongly positive skin reactions with both fresh apple and fresh peach, whereas no skin reactivity was found with extracts from peach peel, peach pulp, or apple pulp. Extract of apple peel produced positive skin reactions in 17 of 18 control subjects; however, the wheals were generally smaller than those induced by fresh fruits. Immunoblot analysis showed no reactivity for peach peel extract. In contrast, the SPTs with fresh fruits showed that some of the 18 patients had strongly positive reactions, but others had weak reactions or negative responses. Further, in a high proportion of the patients, consecutive SPT with fresh apple yielded inconsistent results. In all patients, SPTs with extracts from apple pulp and peach pulp were negative, whereas SPTs with peel extracts were strongly positive in all patients. In most patients, the wheal area induced by SPT with peel extracts was larger than that induced by SPTs with fresh fruits. Immunoblot analysis showed that serum specimens from all 18 patients reacted with a 10-kD protein in peach peel. This is the molecular mass of LTPs.
In birch pollen-allergic patients, the SPTs with fresh foods still remains the most reliable method of diagnosing vegetable food hypersensitivity. In contrast, in patients not allergic to birch pollen, the most reliable strategy for detection of patients sensitive to LTPs is skin prick testing with properly prepared fruit peel extracts. The loss of Bet v 1- and Bet v 2-like structures, which probably occurs during extraction, may facilitate immediate identification of the relevant allergen.
脂质转移蛋白(LTPs)是对蔷薇科(苹果、桃、杏、樱桃、李子和梨)过敏但对桦树花粉不过敏的患者的主要过敏原。
本研究的目的是找到一种灵敏、特异且相对简便的方法来检测对LTP敏感的患者。
我们研究了36名在摄入蔷薇科水果后出现口腔过敏综合征的人。该研究队列分为两组:18名对桦树花粉无过敏反应者(患者)和18名对桦树花粉过敏者(对照受试者)。所有受试者均用新鲜金冠苹果、新鲜桃子以及这两种水果的果皮和果肉提取物进行皮肤点刺试验(SPT)。通过免疫印迹分析进一步研究他们对桃皮提取物的特异性IgE反应性。
对照组的所有18名受试者对新鲜苹果和新鲜桃子的皮肤反应均呈强阳性,而对桃皮、桃果肉或苹果果肉提取物未发现皮肤反应性。苹果皮提取物在18名对照受试者中的17名中产生了阳性皮肤反应;然而,风团通常比新鲜水果引起的风团小。免疫印迹分析显示桃皮提取物无反应性。相比之下,新鲜水果的皮肤点刺试验表明,18名患者中的一些人反应呈强阳性,但其他人反应较弱或无反应。此外,在相当比例的患者中,连续用新鲜苹果进行皮肤点刺试验结果不一致。在所有患者中,苹果果肉和桃果肉提取物的皮肤点刺试验均为阴性,而果皮提取物的皮肤点刺试验在所有患者中均为强阳性。在大多数患者中,果皮提取物皮肤点刺试验引起的风团面积大于新鲜水果皮肤点刺试验引起的风团面积。免疫印迹分析表明,所有18名患者的血清标本均与桃皮中的一种10-kD蛋白发生反应。这是LTPs的分子量。
在对桦树花粉过敏的患者中,新鲜食物的皮肤点刺试验仍然是诊断蔬菜食物过敏最可靠的方法。相比之下,在对桦树花粉不过敏的患者中,检测对LTP敏感患者最可靠的策略是用适当制备的果皮提取物进行皮肤点刺试验。在提取过程中可能发生的Bet v 1和Bet v 2样结构的丧失可能有助于立即识别相关过敏原。