Garner A, Crooks J, Lee A, Bishop R
NRMA CareFlight/NSW Medical Retrieval Service, PO Box 159, 2145, Westmead, Australia.
Injury. 2001 Jul;32(6):455-60. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00013-4.
To determine whether prehospital critical care teams (CCT) would result in improved functional outcomes for road trauma related severe head injury in the Australian setting, when compared with standard advanced life support measures provided by paramedics.
Retrospective review of 250 patients treated by paramedics and 46 patients treated by CCT transported directly from the accident scene, with a prehospital Glasgow coma scale (GCS)< or =8.
CCT-treated patients had longer median prehospital times (113 versus 45 min, P<0.001), and a higher prehospital intubation rate (100% versus 36%, P<0.001) than paramedic-treated patients. On multivariate analysis, revised trauma score > or =4.45 (odds ratio [OR] 2.31, 95% CI: 1.15-4.65), lower injury severity score (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06), age< or =25 years (OR 1.76, 95% CI: 1.13-2.75), absence of an acute subdural haematoma (OR 3.36, 95% CI: 1.89-5.95) and prehospital treatment by a CCT (OR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.48-4.95) independently predicted better outcome.
The range of advanced interventions provided by the CCT were associated with improved functional outcome. Further studies are required to determine the individual factors responsible.
与护理人员提供的标准高级生命支持措施相比,确定在澳大利亚环境下,院前重症护理团队(CCT)是否能改善道路创伤相关严重头部损伤患者的功能结局。
回顾性分析250例由护理人员治疗的患者和46例由CCT直接从事故现场转运的患者,这些患者的院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)≤8分。
与护理人员治疗的患者相比,CCT治疗的患者院前时间中位数更长(113分钟对45分钟,P<0.001),院前插管率更高(100%对36%,P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,修正创伤评分≥4.45(比值比[OR]2.31,95%可信区间:1.15-4.65)、较低的损伤严重程度评分(OR 1.04,95%可信区间:1.02-1.06)、年龄≤25岁(OR 1.76,95%可信区间:1.13-2.75)、无急性硬膜下血肿(OR 3.36,95%可信区间:1.89-5.95)以及由CCT进行院前治疗(OR 2.70,95%可信区间:1.48-4.95)独立预测更好的结局。
CCT提供的一系列高级干预措施与改善功能结局相关。需要进一步研究以确定相关的个体因素。