Garner Alan A, Mann Kristy P, Fearnside Michael, Poynter Elwyn, Gebski Val
CareFlight, Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia.
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emerg Med J. 2015 Nov;32(11):869-75. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204390. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
Advanced prehospital interventions for severe brain injury remains controversial. No previous randomised trial has been conducted to evaluate additional physician intervention compared with paramedic only care.
Participants in this prospective, randomised controlled trial were adult patients with blunt trauma with either a scene GCS score <9 (original definition), or GCS<13 and an Abbreviated Injury Scale score for the head region ≥3 (modified definition). Patients were randomised to either standard ground paramedic treatment or standard treatment plus a physician arriving by helicopter. Patients were evaluated by 30-day mortality and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores. Due to high non-compliance rates, both intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses were preplanned.
375 patients met the original definition, of which 197 was allocated to physician care. Differences in the 6-month GOS scores were not significant on intention-to-treat analysis (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.66, p=0.62) nor was the 30-day mortality (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.38, p=0.66). As-treated analysis showed a 16% reduction in 30-day mortality in those receiving additional physician care; 60/195 (29%) versus 81/180 (45%), p<0.01, Number needed to treat =6. 338 patients met the modified definition, of which 182 were allocated to physician care. The 6-month GOS scores were not significantly different on intention-to-treat analysis (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.75, p=0.56) nor was the 30-day mortality (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.66, p=0.84). As-treated analyses were also not significantly different.
This trial suggests a potential mortality reduction in patients with blunt trauma with GCS<9 receiving additional physician care (original definition only). Confirmatory studies which also address non-compliance issues are needed.
NCT00112398.
严重脑损伤的高级院前干预措施仍存在争议。此前尚无随机试验来评估与仅由护理人员提供的治疗相比,增加医生干预的效果。
这项前瞻性随机对照试验的参与者为钝性创伤成年患者,其现场格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分<9(原始定义),或GCS<13且头部区域简明损伤量表评分≥3(修订定义)。患者被随机分为接受标准地面护理人员治疗组或标准治疗加直升机运送医生治疗组。通过30天死亡率和6个月格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分对患者进行评估。由于不依从率高,预先计划了意向性分析和实际治疗分析。
375例患者符合原始定义,其中197例被分配接受医生治疗。意向性分析显示6个月GOS评分差异无统计学意义(比值比1.11,95%置信区间0.74至1.66,p = 0.62),30天死亡率差异也无统计学意义(比值比0.91,95%置信区间0.60至1.38,p = 0.66)。实际治疗分析显示,接受额外医生治疗的患者30天死亡率降低了16%;60/195(29%)对81/180(45%), p<0.01,需治疗人数=6。338例患者符合修订定义,其中182例被分配接受医生治疗。意向性分析显示6个月GOS评分差异无统计学意义(比值比1.14,95%置信区间0.73至1.75,p = 0.56),30天死亡率差异也无统计学意义(比值比1.05,95%置信区间0.66至1.66,p = 0.84)。实际治疗分析差异也无统计学意义。
本试验表明,对于GCS<9的钝性创伤患者(仅原始定义),接受额外医生治疗可能降低死亡率。需要开展进一步的研究来证实这一结果,并解决不依从问题。
NCT00112398。