Votruba S B, Zeddun S M, Schoeller D A
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Aug;25(8):1240-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801672.
Fatty acid oxidation has frequently been measured using (13)C or (14)C labeled fatty acids. While providing valuable data, the breath test method is hindered by the need for a controlled environment to measure VCO(2) and collect frequent breath samples. Additionally, the CO(2) breath tests require the use of (13)C- or (14)C-acetate to correct for isotope exchange in the TCA cycle. We validated d(31)-palmitic acid for measuring dietary fat oxidation. When oxidized, the deuterium appears as water and mixes with the body water pool providing a cumulative record of fat oxidation.
The recovery of deuterium from d(31)-palmitic acid at 10 h post-dose was compared to that of (13)CO(2) from [1-(13)C]-palmitic acid in nine subjects (body mass index (BMI)=23.6+/-2.8; percentage body fat (%BF)=22.6+/-5.3; mean+/-s.d.). Subjects were studied at rest. [1-(13)C]-acetate (2 mg/kg) was dosed in a liquid breakfast. On a second day, [1-(13)C]-palmitic acid (10 mg/kg) and d(31)-palmitic acid (15 mg/kg) were dosed with the same liquid breakfast.
Recovery of (13)CO(2) from [1-(13)C]-acetate at 10 h post-dose was 53.7+/-10.4%. Recovery of d(31)-palmitic acid was 13.2+/-7.7% (mean+/-s.d.) and [1-(13)C]-palmitic acid recovery was 6.4+/-3.6%. When the (13)C data was corrected for [1-(13)C]-acetate (Na salt) recovery, the mean difference in percentage recovery between the two tracers was 0.5+/-2.8% and cumulative recoveries through 10 h post-dose were highly correlated (y=1.045x - 0.47; r(2)=0.88, P<0.0002). Our data shows both labels to be equivalent in their ability to measure dietary fat oxidation in resting subjects.
The use of deuterium labeled palmitic acid eliminates the need for rigid control over the subjects' environment. Frequent sampling and measurement of VCO(2) are not needed for accurate calculation of percentage recovery of the deuterium label. In addition, the deuterium label has a decreased potential for isotopic exchange compared to (13)C or (14)C, so a recovery correction factor is probably not required.
脂肪酸氧化通常使用碳-13(¹³C)或碳-14(¹⁴C)标记的脂肪酸进行测量。虽然该呼气试验方法提供了有价值的数据,但由于需要在受控环境中测量二氧化碳呼出量(VCO₂)并频繁采集呼气样本,其应用受到了限制。此外,二氧化碳呼气试验需要使用¹³C-或¹⁴C-醋酸盐来校正三羧酸循环中的同位素交换。我们验证了d³¹-棕榈酸用于测量膳食脂肪氧化的可行性。氧化时,氘以水的形式出现并与体内水池混合,提供脂肪氧化的累积记录。
比较了9名受试者(体重指数(BMI)=23.6±2.8;体脂百分比(%BF)=22.6±5.3;均值±标准差)在给药后10小时从d³¹-棕榈酸中回收氘与从[1-¹³C]-棕榈酸中回收¹³CO₂的情况。受试者在静息状态下接受研究。在一份液体早餐中给予[1-¹³C]-醋酸盐(2mg/kg)。在第二天,在相同的液体早餐中给予[1-¹³C]-棕榈酸(10mg/kg)和d³¹-棕榈酸(15mg/kg)。
给药后10小时从[1-¹³C]-醋酸盐中回收¹³CO₂的比例为53.7±10.4%。d³¹-棕榈酸的回收率为13.2±7.7%(均值±标准差),[1-¹³C]-棕榈酸的回收率为6.4±3.6%。当对¹³C数据校正[1-¹³C]-醋酸盐(钠盐)的回收率后,两种示踪剂回收率百分比的平均差异为0.5±2.8%,给药后10小时内的累积回收率高度相关(y = 1.045x - 0.47;r² = 0.88,P < 0.0002)。我们的数据表明,两种标记物在测量静息受试者膳食脂肪氧化的能力上是等效的。
使用氘标记的棕榈酸无需对受试者的环境进行严格控制。准确计算氘标记物的回收率百分比不需要频繁采样和测量VCO₂。此外,与¹³C或¹⁴C相比,氘标记物的同位素交换潜力降低,因此可能不需要回收率校正因子。