Nibert A T, Young A
Baccalaureate Degree Program, College of Nursing, Houston Baptist University, 7502 Fondren Rd, Houston, TX 77074, USA.
Comput Nurs. 2001 Jul-Aug;19(4):172-8.
This was the third annual validity study designed to assess the accuracy of the HESI Exam (E2) in predicting NCLEX success for graduating registered and practical nursing students. As in year I (N = 2,725) and year II (N = 3,752), in year III (N = 6,277), the E2 was highly predictive of NCLEX success for associate degree nursing, bachelor of science nursing, diploma, and practical nursing students. Unlike previous years, in year III, monitoring was not a significant factor in the predictive accuracy of the E2. NCLEX success of low-scoring E2 students, first examined in year II, was also examined in year III. As in year II, low-scoring E2 students were significantly more (P = .001) likely to fail the licensure examination than high-scoring E2 students. In year III, unlike year II, there was no significant difference in the pass rate of low-scoring E2 students who participated in a remediation program and those who did not. The authors recommended that a more definitive definition of remediation be used in future studies and that such studies focus on E2 implementation strategies and their relationship to NCLEX success.
这是第三次年度效度研究,旨在评估HESI考试(E2)在预测护理学专业本科和专科毕业生NCLEX考试通过率方面的准确性。与第一年(N = 2725)和第二年(N = 3752)一样,在第三年(N = 6277),E2对护理学副学士学位、护理学理学学士、文凭护理和实用护理专业的学生的NCLEX考试通过率具有高度预测性。与前几年不同的是,在第三年,监测并非E2预测准确性的重要因素。第二年首次对E2低得分学生的NCLEX考试通过率进行了研究,第三年也进行了此项研究。与第二年一样,E2低得分学生未通过执照考试的可能性显著高于高得分学生(P = 0.001)。在第三年,与第二年不同的是,参加辅导计划的E2低得分学生和未参加辅导计划的学生的通过率没有显著差异。作者建议在未来的研究中使用更明确的辅导定义,并且此类研究应关注E2的实施策略及其与NCLEX考试通过率的关系。