Homann D, Teyton L, Oldstone M B
Division of Virology, Department of Neuropharmacology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Nat Med. 2001 Aug;7(8):913-9. doi: 10.1038/90950.
Emerging evidence indicates that CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell immunity is differentially regulated. Here we have delineated differences and commonalities among antiviral T-cell responses by enumeration and functional profiling of eight specific CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell populations during primary, memory and recall responses. A high degree of coordinate regulation among all specific T-cell populations stood out against an approximately 20-fold lower peak expansion and prolonged contraction phase of specific CD4+ T-cell populations. Surprisingly, although CD8+ T-cell memory was stably maintained for life, levels of specific CD4+ memory T cells gradually declined. However, this decay, which seemed to result from less efficient rescue from apoptosis, did not affect functionality of surviving virus-specific CD4+ T cells. Our results indicate that CD4+ T-cell memory might become limiting under physiological conditions and that conditions precipitating CD4+ T-cell loss might compromise protective immunity even in the presence of unimpaired CD8+ T-cell responses.
新出现的证据表明,CD8+和CD4+ T细胞免疫受到不同的调节。在这里,我们通过对八个特定的CD8+和CD4+ T细胞群体在初次、记忆和回忆反应期间进行计数和功能分析,描绘了抗病毒T细胞反应之间的差异和共性。所有特定T细胞群体之间高度的协同调节与特定CD4+ T细胞群体约低20倍的峰值扩增和延长的收缩期形成鲜明对比。令人惊讶的是,尽管CD8+ T细胞记忆能终生稳定维持,但特定CD4+记忆T细胞的水平却逐渐下降。然而,这种似乎由凋亡挽救效率较低导致的衰退,并未影响存活的病毒特异性CD4+ T细胞的功能。我们的结果表明,在生理条件下,CD4+ T细胞记忆可能会受到限制,并且促使CD4+ T细胞丢失的条件可能会损害保护性免疫,即使在CD8+ T细胞反应未受损的情况下也是如此。