• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Liverpool brief assessment system for communication skills in the making of doctors.

作者信息

Humphris G M, Kaney S

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Whelan Building, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2001;6(1):69-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1009879220949.

DOI:10.1023/a:1009879220949
PMID:11486140
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The teaching of clinical communication skills is gaining importance in medical schools. There is a need to design feasible assessments that are credible to faculty, students and the profession.

AIM

To design, and assess the reliability and validity of a new communication skills assessment system (the Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale-LCSAS, and the Global Simulated Patient Rating Scale-GSPRS) for employment in OSCEs.

PARTICIPANTS

The first three annual intakes of students to the new medical curriculum at Liverpool Medical School (n = 600). Two further sub samples of 1st year (n = 60) and 2nd year students (n = 80) were included for further validation purposes in separate studies.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Intra class correlation coefficients and generalisability coefficients were employed to assess reliability of the LCSAS and GSPRS. Validity was tested by examining predicted relationships using pearson product moment correlation coefficients.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The LCSAS and GSPRS showed reasonable evidence for their reliability and validity although further work is recommended.

摘要

相似文献

1
The Liverpool brief assessment system for communication skills in the making of doctors.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2001;6(1):69-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1009879220949.
2
Examiner fatigue in communication skills objective structured clinical examinations.沟通技能客观结构化临床考试中的考官疲劳
Med Educ. 2001 May;35(5):444-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00893.x.
3
Communication skills knowledge, understanding and OSCE performance in medical trainees: a multivariate prospective study using structural equation modelling.医学实习生的沟通技巧知识、理解及客观结构化临床考试表现:一项使用结构方程模型的多变量前瞻性研究
Med Educ. 2002 Sep;36(9):842-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01295.x.
4
Effect of communications training on medical student performance.沟通培训对医学生表现的影响。
JAMA. 2003 Sep 3;290(9):1157-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.9.1157.
5
Simulated patient's feedback to improve communication skills of clerkship students.模拟患者反馈以提高实习医学生的沟通技巧。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jan 15;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1914-2.
6
Summative assessment of undergraduates' communication competence in challenging doctor-patient encounters. Evaluation of the Düsseldorf CoMeD-OSCE.本科医学生在具有挑战性的医患沟通情境中沟通能力的总结性评估。对杜塞尔多夫CoMeD-OSCE的评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jun;95(3):348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
7
Assessing the communication skills of doctors in training: reliability and sources of error.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2003;8(1):5-16. doi: 10.1023/a:1022609920310.
8
Development and validation of the "FrOCK": Frankfurt observer communication checklist.“FrOCK”(法兰克福观察者沟通清单)的开发与验证
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(8):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Sep 16.
9
Standardised clients as assessors in a veterinary communication OSCE: a reliability and validity study.
Vet Rec. 2014 Nov 22;175(20):509. doi: 10.1136/vr.102633. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
10
Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.评估手术室受训者的手术技能:一种前瞻性观察研究方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta15010.

引用本文的文献

1
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Empathic Communication Coding System.共情沟通编码系统的评分者内信度和评分者间信度。
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Mar 24;88(7):420-428. doi: 10.1177/03080226251314367. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Does Communication Effectiveness Assessed by Communication Scholars Correlate with Patient Perception of Clinician Empathy?传播学学者评估的沟通有效性与患者对临床医生同理心的感知相关吗?
J Patient Exp. 2025 Feb 21;12:23743735251323674. doi: 10.1177/23743735251323674. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessing the empathy of medical students during medical interview training in Japan by using mixed-methods surveys of simulated patients.
通过对模拟患者进行混合方法调查来评估日本医学生在医学面试培训期间的同理心。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Sep 17;8:179. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000179.1. eCollection 2019.
4
Consistency Analysis in Medical Empathy Intervention Research.医学共情干预研究中的一致性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 1;19(17):10904. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710904.
5
Focused-Attention Meditation Improves Flow, Communication Skills, and Safety Attitudes of Surgeons.专注冥想能提高外科医生的流畅度、沟通技巧和安全态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;19(9):5292. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095292.
6
Effects of Loving-Kindness Meditation on Doctors' Mindfulness, Empathy, and Communication Skills.慈心冥想对医生正念、同理心和沟通技巧的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;18(8):4033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084033.
7
Identifying the competencies of China's paediatric residents: a modified Delphi method study.确定中国儿科住院医师的能力:一项改良德尔菲法研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 17;11(2):e041741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041741.
8
Clinical assessors' working conceptualisations of undergraduate consultation skills: a framework analysis of how assessors make expert judgements in practice.临床评估者对本科问诊技能的工作概念化理解:评估者如何在实践中做出专家判断的框架分析。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Oct;25(4):845-875. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-09960-3. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
Systematic Review of Computer Based Assessments in Medical Education.医学教育中基于计算机评估的系统评价
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2016 May-Aug;4(2):79-88. doi: 10.4103/1658-631X.178288. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
10
Assessing Communication Skills of Medical Students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE)--A Systematic Review of Rating Scales.在客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中评估医学生的沟通技巧——评分量表的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152717. eCollection 2016.