Rooijmans H G
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 Jul 21;145(29):1384-6.
A recent report from the Health Council of the Netherlands considers the cost-effectiveness of long-term psychotherapy (more than 25 sessions over a period of more than one year). It is concluded that knowledge about the efficacy and effectiveness of this form of therapy is scarce, and the cost-effectiveness is largely unknown. A plea is made for further research and for restraints in the administration of such therapy. However, research into the efficacy of long-term psychotherapy requires a controlled design, with the selection and randomisation of patients. This precludes definitive conclusions with regard to the cost-effectiveness in open patient groups. Moreover, psychotherapy is not only aimed at a cure, but also to a fairly large extent at care. Finally, if it is difficult to determine the efficacy of psychotherapy then this is even more so the case for long-term psychotherapy, as the success may be attributable to a wide range of intervening events that occur during the course of treatment.
荷兰卫生委员会最近的一份报告探讨了长期心理治疗(一年多时间内超过25次治疗)的成本效益。结论是,关于这种治疗形式的疗效和有效性的知识匮乏,其成本效益在很大程度上也未知。报告呼吁进行进一步研究,并在实施这种治疗时加以限制。然而,对长期心理治疗疗效的研究需要有对照设计,包括患者的选择和随机分组。这使得无法就开放患者群体中的成本效益得出明确结论。此外,心理治疗不仅旨在治愈,在很大程度上还旨在提供护理。最后,如果难以确定心理治疗的疗效,那么对于长期心理治疗来说更是如此,因为治疗成功可能归因于治疗过程中发生的一系列干预事件。