Suppr超能文献

股骨头骨骺滑脱预防性内固定的风险效益分析。

Risk-benefit analysis of prophylactic pinning in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

作者信息

Seller K, Raab P, Wild A, Krauspe R

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Würzburg, König-Ludwig-Haus, Germany.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001 Jul;10(3):192-6.

Abstract

There is a broad and controversial discussion about the surgical procedure and the type of hardware for internal transfixation of the epiphysis and metaphysis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Prophylactic pinning is even more controversial. One hundred and nine patients showing SCFE underwent a one-stage bilateral fixation of the epiphysis with three or four Kirschner wires (pins). From these 109 patients (69 male and 40 female), 94 had an unilateral slip and were operated prophylactically on the contralateral side. There were no complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head, chondrolysis, bone fracture, failure of metal implant, osteomyelitis or deep wound infection either at the time of surgery or at the minimum follow-up of 1 year with prophylactic pinning in SCFE. Therefore, we consider pinning allows for efficient stabilization, reliably preventing any progression of SCFE on the affected side and, furthermore, prevents the incidence of a secondary slip on the primarily nondisplaced contralateral side. The transfixation of epiphysis and metaphysis with Kirschner wires (pins) shows good subjective and objective long-term results compared with other surgical methods and implants. There is only a low morbidity rate with this method, because reoperations may only become necessary in the younger age group owing to normal growth of the femoral neck, compared with a high benefit from prophylactic surgical treatment of the nonaffected opposite side at the time of unilateral onset of the disease. The pins may no longer catch the epiphysis but further growth will allow for remodeling of the femoral head and for an optimal neck/shaft ratio. In case of further growth and relative shortening of the pins, refixation may become necessary. Therefore, we like to recommend the Kirschner-wire transfixation (pinning) of the epiphysis and metaphysis in patients with SCFE for primary treatment of SCFE as well as for prophylactic pinning of the contralateral side in one sitting.

摘要

对于股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)时骨骺和干骺端的内固定手术方法及内固定器械类型,存在广泛且有争议的讨论。预防性穿针固定则更具争议性。109例患有SCFE的患者接受了用三或四根克氏针进行的一期双侧骨骺固定术。在这109例患者中(69例男性和40例女性),94例为单侧滑脱,并对其对侧进行了预防性手术。在手术时以及对SCFE进行预防性穿针固定后至少1年的随访期内,均未出现诸如股骨头缺血性坏死、软骨溶解、骨折、金属植入物失效、骨髓炎或深部伤口感染等并发症。因此,我们认为穿针固定可实现有效的稳定,可靠地防止患侧SCFE的任何进展,此外,还可预防原本未移位的对侧出现继发性滑脱。与其他手术方法和植入物相比,用克氏针( pins )进行骨骺和干骺端的穿针固定显示出良好的主观和客观长期效果。该方法的发病率较低,因为与在疾病单侧发病时对未受影响的对侧进行预防性手术治疗所带来的高收益相比,仅在较年轻年龄组中由于股骨颈的正常生长可能需要再次手术。随着进一步生长,克氏针可能不再固定骨骺,但股骨头的重塑以及最佳的颈干比仍可实现。如果出现进一步生长且克氏针相对缩短,则可能需要重新固定。因此,我们建议对患有SCFE的患者采用克氏针穿针固定(pinning)来对SCFE进行初次治疗以及对侧的预防性穿针固定,可一次完成。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验