Suppr超能文献

不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱采用克氏针固定骨骺后的临床结果。

Clinical outcome after transfixation of the epiphysis with Kirschner wires in unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

作者信息

Seller K, Wild A, Westhoff B, Raab P, Krauspe R

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2006 Oct;30(5):342-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0110-2. Epub 2006 Apr 19.

Abstract

Treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is still controversial. Agreement has not yet been reached on the appropriate time to perform surgery, the necessity of repositioning manoeuvres, the type of implants for stabilisation, or the need for prophylactic treatment of the contralateral side. In this retrospective study, we present 29 patients with unstable (acute and acute-on-chronic) SCFE treated by internal fixation of the epiphysis with three or four Kirschner wires both therapeutically on the affected side and prophylactically on the not (yet) affected side. After hardware removal and mean follow-up of 3.5 years, radiological and clinical examination of hip function was carried out. X-ray in two planes showed no incidence of any slip progression. Applying the score used by Heyman and Herndon, 18 results (62.1%) were classified as excellent, nine (31.1%) as good, one (3.4%) as fair, and one (3.4%) as poor. The rate of severe complications such as chondrolysis and avascular necrosis of the femoral head was low in our series (0% and 6.8%, respectively). This form of therapeutic management shows good clinical results with low complication rates. The slip can be efficiently stabilised, progression is reliably prevented, and remodelling of the joint gives the patient good overall hip function. We see no indication for emergency surgery.

摘要

股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)的治疗仍存在争议。对于手术的合适时机、复位操作的必要性、稳定所用植入物的类型或对侧预防性治疗的需求,尚未达成共识。在这项回顾性研究中,我们报告了29例不稳定型(急性和慢性急性发作)SCFE患者,通过在患侧进行治疗性以及在未(尚)受影响侧进行预防性的骨骺三或四根克氏针内固定治疗。在取出内固定装置并平均随访3.5年后,对髋关节功能进行了放射学和临床检查。双平面X线检查显示无任何滑脱进展的情况。应用Heyman和Herndon使用的评分标准,18例结果(62.1%)为优,9例(31.1%)为良,1例(3.4%)为可,1例(3.4%)为差。在我们的系列研究中,严重并发症如软骨溶解和股骨头缺血性坏死的发生率较低(分别为0%和6.8%)。这种治疗方式显示出良好的临床效果且并发症发生率低。滑脱可有效稳定,进展可可靠预防,关节重塑使患者获得良好的整体髋关节功能。我们认为没有急诊手术的指征。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Epiphy seodesis for early slipping of the upper femoral epiphysis.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954 Jun;36-A(3):539-55.
5
The contralateral hip in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996 Summer;5(3):158-61. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199605030-00004.
6
Bilaterality in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: importance of a reliable radiographic method.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996 Spring;5(2):80-4. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199605020-00005.
7
Acetabular version in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a prospective study.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996 Spring;5(2):77-9. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199605020-00004.
8
Femoral version in acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996 Spring;5(2):74-6. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199605020-00003.
9
Open bone peg epiphysiodesis for slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
J Pediatr Orthop. 1996 Jan-Feb;16(1):37-48. doi: 10.1097/00004694-199601000-00008.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验