Jedrychowski W, Maugeri U, Jedrychowska-Bianchi I
College of Medicine, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2001 May;9(2):91-4.
In the last decade evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become popular between clinicians and epidemiologists as a tool to facilitate the translation of scientific research into clinical practice. In public health, this approach is important for health protection, different levels of disease prevention, and health promotion practice. EBM concept applicable to public health follows the same principles, but some additional aspects have to be considered. For example, in preventive medicine, there is the strong need to compare the relative effectiveness of various interventions in prolonging survival or preventing the occurrence or complications of a disease, as it is crucial for setting preventive priorities. Usually, systematic reviews and meta-analyses quantify the effects of treatments on selected endpoints (health outcomes). However, in setting preventive priorities the reverse perspective is important. The judgement about preventive action cannot be done without an adequate consideration of ethical and social context. In view of emerging evidence-based medicine to health professionals became of paramount importance. In the paper, this course of action has been discussed as an aftermath of the EB training workshop organized in Pavia (Italy) by the International Center for Studies and Research in Biomedicine.
在过去十年中,循证医学(EBM)在临床医生和流行病学家中广受欢迎,成为促进科研成果转化为临床实践的一种工具。在公共卫生领域,这种方法对于健康保护、不同层面的疾病预防以及健康促进实践都很重要。适用于公共卫生的循证医学概念遵循相同的原则,但还需考虑一些其他方面。例如,在预防医学中,非常有必要比较各种干预措施在延长生存期或预防疾病发生及并发症方面的相对有效性,因为这对于确定预防重点至关重要。通常,系统评价和荟萃分析会量化治疗对选定终点(健康结果)的影响。然而,在确定预防重点时,相反的视角很重要。如果没有充分考虑伦理和社会背景,就无法对预防行动做出判断。鉴于循证医学的新证据,这对卫生专业人员变得至关重要。在本文中,这一行动过程作为由国际生物医学研究与研究中心在意大利帕维亚举办的循证医学培训研讨会的后续情况进行了讨论。