van der Mei Henny C, White Donald J, Cox Ed R, Geertsema-Doornbusch Gesinda I, Busscher Henk J
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(1):44-9.
This study compared the detachment by supernates of nine different dentifrices of four oral bacterial strains adhering to a salivary pellicle in a parallel plate flow chamber. Ultra-thin bovine enamel slabs were coated for 1.5 h with human whole saliva. Following buffer rinsing, a bacterial suspension of Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus mutans or Actinomyces naeslundii was perfused through the flow chamber at a shear rate of 30 s-1 for four hours, and the number of adhering bacteria n4h was enumerated by image analysis after buffer rinsing at the same shear rate. Then, a 25 wt%-dentifrice/water supernate was perfused through the flow chamber for four minutes, followed by eight minutes of buffer rinsing and another enumeration of the number of bacteria that had remained adhering nad. Finally, an air-bubble was passed through the flow chamber to mimic the occasionally high detachment forces occurring in the oral cavity, and the adhering bacteria nab were counted again. On average, S. sanguis was the easiest to detach (73% averaged over all dentifrice supernates), while A. naeslundii was the most difficult (22% on average). The combined detachment of bacteria by dentifrice supernates and air-bubble ranged from a low of 16% to a high of 80%. Dentifrices containing pyrophosphate and polymeric polyphosphate (hexametaphosphate) surface active ingredients appeared to produce the most consistent and strongest desorption effects on plaque bacteria. Factors apparently important to bacterial detachment from pellicle-covered tooth surfaces by dentifrice formulations include the nature of adhesion of bacterial strains and chemical composition of the dentifrice formulations, including pH, surfactant system and the effect of added ingredients (dispersants, metal ions, peroxides, baking soda).
本研究在平行平板流动腔中比较了九种不同牙膏的上清液对四种附着于唾液薄膜的口腔细菌菌株的去除情况。超薄牛牙釉质片用人体全唾液包被1.5小时。缓冲液冲洗后,将口腔链球菌、血链球菌、变形链球菌或内氏放线菌的细菌悬液以30 s-¹的剪切速率灌注通过流动腔4小时,在相同剪切速率下用缓冲液冲洗后,通过图像分析计算4小时时附着细菌的数量n4h。然后,将25 wt%-牙膏/水的上清液灌注通过流动腔4分钟,接着用缓冲液冲洗8分钟,并再次计算剩余附着细菌的数量nad。最后,使一个气泡通过流动腔以模拟口腔中偶尔出现的高去除力,并再次计数附着细菌nab。平均而言,血链球菌最容易被去除(所有牙膏上清液的平均值为73%),而内氏放线菌最难被去除(平均为22%)。牙膏上清液和气泡对细菌的联合去除率在16%至80%之间。含有焦磷酸盐和聚合多磷酸盐(六偏磷酸盐)表面活性成分的牙膏似乎对牙菌斑细菌产生最一致且最强的解吸作用。对于牙膏配方从覆盖有薄膜的牙齿表面去除细菌而言,显然重要因素包括细菌菌株的黏附性质以及牙膏配方的化学成分,包括pH值、表面活性剂体系以及添加成分(分散剂、金属离子、过氧化物、小苏打)的作用。