Sachdev H P, Mahajan S C, Garg A
Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi 110 002, India.
Indian Pediatr. 2001 Aug;38(8):827-38.
To evaluate the relative frequency of other conditions that share a clinical overlap with pneumonia as defined by the WHO case management algorithm and to determine the possibility of refining the antibiotic and bronchodilator prescription on the basis of simple clinical features.
Prospective observational.
Urban tertiary care center.
Two hundred children, between the ages of 6 months to 5 years, presenting with difficult breathing (as defined by WHO algorithm) were prospectively evaluated for the diagnosis and the need for bronchodilator and antibiotic therapy (clinician s diagnosis). An additional independent blinded evaluation of the chest X-rays was done by a radiologist after the study (radiologist-aided diagnosis). On the basis of reliable predictors (sensitivity > 70% and specificity > 70%) of antibiotic and bronchodilator prescription, irrespective of the exact diagnostic category, two viable modifications of WHO case management algorithm emerged, which were compared by paired proportion test.
Acute asthma was the predominant condition (46% or 54%), pneumonia alone was rare (10%), co-existence of pneumonia with wheeze (bronchospasm) was more frequent (22% or 15%) and often diagnoses not related to the respiratory system were documented (18% or 17%). All the subjects in whom a preceding history of cough was not elicited had non-respiratory illnesses. An audible wheeze was appreciated in only 44 of the 150 cases (29.3%) with an auscultable wheeze. The two alternatives represented a significant (p < 0.0001) improvement over the WHO algorithm preventing inappropriate usage of both antibiotics and bronchodilators, primarily by restricting over-prescription of the former (14% and 26.5% for proposed algorithms 1 and 2, respectively) and under-utilization of the latter (40%). The performance of the alternative algorithms for the radiologist-aided diagnosis was marginally better for over-prescription of antibiotics (16.2% and 30.9% for proposed algorithms 1 and 2, respectively).
It is feasible to amalgamate simple clinical features (history of: (i) previous similar episode of cough and difficult breathing, and (ii) fever) in the WHO case management algorithm to significantly refine the antibiotic (95% CI range 7% to 33%) and bronchodilator (35%; 95% CI 27% to 43%) prescription.
评估与世界卫生组织(WHO)病例管理算法所定义的肺炎存在临床重叠的其他病症的相对频率,并根据简单的临床特征确定优化抗生素和支气管扩张剂处方的可能性。
前瞻性观察研究。
城市三级医疗中心。
对200名年龄在6个月至5岁之间、出现呼吸困难(根据WHO算法定义)的儿童进行前瞻性评估,以确定诊断以及是否需要支气管扩张剂和抗生素治疗(临床医生诊断)。研究结束后,由一名放射科医生对胸部X光片进行额外的独立盲法评估(放射科医生辅助诊断)。基于抗生素和支气管扩张剂处方的可靠预测指标(敏感性>70%且特异性>70%),无论确切的诊断类别如何,出现了两种可行的WHO病例管理算法修改方案,并通过配对比例检验进行比较。
急性哮喘是主要病症(46%或54%),单纯肺炎很少见(10%),肺炎与喘息(支气管痉挛)并存的情况更常见(22%或15%),且经常记录到与呼吸系统无关的诊断(18%或)。所有未引出咳嗽既往史的受试者均患有非呼吸道疾病。在150例可闻及喘息的病例中,只有44例(29.3%)可听到明显喘息声。这两种替代方案相较于WHO算法有显著改善(p<0.0001),主要通过限制抗生素的过度处方(方案1和方案2分别为14%和26.5%)以及支气管扩张剂的使用不足(40%),从而避免了抗生素和支气管扩张剂的不当使用。对于放射科医生辅助诊断,替代算法在抗生素过度处方方面的表现略好(方案1和方案2分别为16.2%和30.9%)。
将简单的临床特征(既往类似咳嗽和呼吸困难发作史以及发热史)纳入WHO病例管理算法中,以显著优化抗生素(95%CI范围为7%至33%)和支气管扩张剂(35%;95%CI为27%至43%)处方是可行的。