Suppr超能文献

颈部肌张力障碍中的手臂震颤与特发性震颤不同,可根据发病年龄和症状扩散情况进行分类。

Arm tremor in cervical dystonia differs from essential tremor and can be classified by onset age and spread of symptoms.

作者信息

Münchau A, Schrag A, Chuang C, MacKinnon C D, Bhatia K P, Quinn N P, Rothwell J C

机构信息

Sobell Department of Neurophysiology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Brain. 2001 Sep;124(Pt 9):1765-76. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.9.1765.

Abstract

The pathophysiology of arm tremor in patients with cervical dystonia (CD) and its relationship to other types of tremor is unclear. In the present study, we have compared the tremor in these patients with that seen in patients with essential tremor (ET) using two neurophysiological techniques: the triphasic EMG pattern accompanying ballistic wrist flexion movements; and reciprocal inhibition between forearm muscles. During ballistic wrist flexion movements, the latency of the second agonist EMG burst was later in ET than CD patients. This suggests that the mechanism of the arm tremor in CD may differ from that in ET. There was no group difference between reciprocal inhibition in patients with ET or CD. However, there was much more variability in the data from patients with CD. Because of this, we subdivided the CD patients into two groups, group A with normal levels of presynaptic inhibition and group B with reduced or absent presynaptic inhibition. A posteriori, it turned out that the patients in these two subgroups had similar clinical symptoms, but different clinical histories. The arm tremor of patients in group A started simultaneously with torticollis (mean onset age of arm tremor 40 years +/- 20.7 SD, interval between onset of arm tremor and torticollis 0 +/- 2.9 years) whereas it began much earlier (mean onset age 14 years +/- 6 SD) and preceded onset of torticollis by a longer interval (21.6 +/- 17.5 years) in patients of group B. Patients in group A also had less co-contraction in their ballistic wrist movements between the first agonist and the antagonist burst than those patients in group B. We conclude that arm tremor in patients with CD may have a mechanism different from that seen in patients with ET. Moreover, the data imply that there are two subgroups of CD patients with arm tremor, one with a late and simultaneous onset of arm tremor and torticollis (group A), and another with an early onset of arm tremor and later development of torticollis (group B). These groups do not correspond to the currently proposed clinical subdivision of 'dystonic tremor' and 'tremor associated with dystonia'.

摘要

颈部肌张力障碍(CD)患者手臂震颤的病理生理学及其与其他类型震颤的关系尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们使用两种神经生理学技术,比较了这些患者与特发性震颤(ET)患者的震颤情况:伴随弹道式腕关节屈曲运动的三相肌电图模式;以及前臂肌肉之间的交互抑制。在弹道式腕关节屈曲运动期间,ET患者中第二激动剂肌电图爆发的潜伏期比CD患者更长。这表明CD患者手臂震颤的机制可能与ET患者不同。ET患者或CD患者之间的交互抑制没有组间差异。然而,CD患者的数据变异性更大。因此,我们将CD患者分为两组,A组突触前抑制水平正常,B组突触前抑制降低或缺失。事后发现,这两个亚组的患者临床症状相似,但临床病史不同。A组患者的手臂震颤与斜颈同时开始(手臂震颤平均发病年龄40岁±20.7标准差,手臂震颤发病与斜颈发病之间的间隔为0±2.9年),而B组患者的手臂震颤开始得更早(平均发病年龄14岁±6标准差),且在斜颈发病之前的间隔更长(21.6±17.5年)。A组患者在弹道式腕关节运动中,第一激动剂和拮抗剂爆发之间的共同收缩也比B组患者少。我们得出结论,CD患者的手臂震颤可能具有与ET患者不同的机制。此外,数据表明,有两组患有手臂震颤的CD患者,一组手臂震颤和斜颈发病较晚且同时出现(A组),另一组手臂震颤发病较早,斜颈发病较晚(B组)。这些组与目前提出的“肌张力障碍性震颤”和“与肌张力障碍相关的震颤”的临床分类不对应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验