• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估酒精教育项目对大学生态度、知识和自我报告行为的影响。

Evaluation of alcohol education programs on attitude, knowledge, and self-reported behavior of college students.

作者信息

Sharmer L

机构信息

State University of New York, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2001 Sep;24(3):336-57. doi: 10.1177/01632780122034957.

DOI:10.1177/01632780122034957
PMID:11523322
Abstract

This research was conducted as a pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of two different types of alcohol education programs for college students. The educational programs were a teacher-centered motivational speech and "Alcohol 101," a new student-centered CD-ROM interactive program. The research was conducted at a public university in the Northeastern United States. A pretest/posttest quasi-experimental control group design was used. The instrument used was the Student Alcohol Questionnaire (SAQ). Univariate analysis of covariance was used to test for postintervention differences across groups for attitudes and knowledge about alcohol and self-reported alcohol consumption behavior. A statistically significant difference between groups for the second postintervention measure of attitude was identified. No significant differences in knowledge that could be attributed to the interventions were found, and no statistically significant differences were found for self-reported behavior.

摘要

本研究作为一项试点研究开展,旨在评估两种不同类型的大学生酒精教育项目的有效性。教育项目分别是教师主导的激励性演讲和“酒精101”,这是一个新的以学生为中心的光盘互动项目。研究在美国东北部的一所公立大学进行。采用了前测/后测准实验对照组设计。所使用的工具是学生酒精调查问卷(SAQ)。协方差单变量分析用于检验各干预组在酒精态度、知识以及自我报告的饮酒行为方面的干预后差异。在第二次干预后态度测量中,发现各干预组之间存在统计学上的显著差异。未发现可归因于干预措施的知识方面的显著差异,且自我报告行为方面也未发现统计学上的显著差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of alcohol education programs on attitude, knowledge, and self-reported behavior of college students.评估酒精教育项目对大学生态度、知识和自我报告行为的影响。
Eval Health Prof. 2001 Sep;24(3):336-57. doi: 10.1177/01632780122034957.
2
Interactive multimedia preventive alcohol education: a technology application in higher education.交互式多媒体预防酒精教育:高等教育中的一项技术应用
J Drug Educ. 2000;30(4):399-421. doi: 10.2190/LWMQ-9CQA-B78H-9MA7.
3
Reductions in drinking and alcohol-related harms reported by first-year college students taking an online alcohol education course: a randomized trial.参与在线酒精教育课程的大一学生报告的饮酒量减少和与酒精相关的危害减少:一项随机试验。
J Health Commun. 2010 Oct;15(7):805-19. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.514032.
4
The glass is half full: evidence for efficacy of alcohol-wise at one university but not the other.杯子里还有半杯水:一所大学证明了酒精明智法的有效性,而另一所大学则不然。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(6):627-38. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1012239. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
5
Reducing alcohol use in college students: a controlled trial of two brief interventions.减少大学生饮酒量:两种简短干预措施的对照试验
J Drug Educ. 2000;30(3):361-72. doi: 10.2190/JHML-0JPD-YE7L-14CT.
6
Trauma prevention: an evaluation tool for youth and alcohol trauma-prevention programs.创伤预防:青少年及酒精相关创伤预防项目的评估工具
J Trauma Nurs. 1998 Jan-Mar;5(1):12-6. doi: 10.1097/00043860-199801000-00003.
7
Impact of an online alcohol education course on behavior and harm for incoming first-year college students: short-term evaluation of a randomized trial.在线酒精教育课程对即将入学的一年级大学生行为及危害的影响:一项随机试验的短期评估
J Am Coll Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;57(4):445-54. doi: 10.3200/JACH.57.4.445-454.
8
College student perceptions on campus alcohol policies and consumption patterns.大学生对校园酒精政策及消费模式的看法。
J Drug Educ. 2011;41(4):345-58. doi: 10.2190/DE.41.4.a.
9
One size (never) fits all: segment differences observed following a school-based alcohol social marketing program.一刀切(永远)行不通:一项基于学校的酒精社交营销项目实施后观察到的群体差异。
J Sch Health. 2015 Apr;85(4):251-9. doi: 10.1111/josh.12244.
10
Sensation seeking, self-esteem, and unprotected sex in college students.大学生的感觉寻求、自尊与无保护性行为
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2006 Sep-Oct;17(5):23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2006.07.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Alcohol Interventions for College Students Improves Antecedents of Behavioral Change: Results from a Meta-Analysis of 34 Randomized Controlled Trials.针对大学生的酒精干预改善了行为改变的前提条件:34项随机对照试验的荟萃分析结果
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2009 Sep;28(7):799-823. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2009.28.7.799.
2
Piloting of the Just Say Know prevention program: a psychoeducational approach to translating the neuroscience of addiction to youth.《Just Say Know 预防计划的试行:将成瘾的神经科学转化为青少年可理解的知识》
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2021 Jan 2;47(1):16-25. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1770777. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
3
Self-reported campus alcohol policy and college alcohol consumption: a multilevel analysis of 4592 Korean students from 82 colleges.
自我报告的校园酒精政策与大学生酒精消费:对来自 82 所高校的 4592 名韩国学生的多层次分析。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Feb 1;15(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-0255-9.
4
The Utility of a Brief Web-Based Prevention Intervention as a Universal Approach for Risky Alcohol Use in College Students: Evidence of Moderation by Family History.一种基于网络的简短预防干预措施作为大学生危险饮酒普遍方法的效用:家族史的调节作用证据
Front Psychol. 2018 May 22;9:747. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00747. eCollection 2018.
5
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations.针对社区居住人群减少有害和危险饮酒行为的个性化数字干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):CD011479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011479.pub2.
6
Personalized boosters for a computerized intervention targeting college drinking: The influence of protective behavioral strategies.针对大学生饮酒问题的计算机化干预的个性化强化措施:保护性行为策略的影响。
J Am Coll Health. 2016 Oct;64(7):509-19. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2016.1185725. Epub 2016 May 5.
7
Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对青少年和青年的简短酒精干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Apr;51:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
Impact of providing drinkers with "know your limit" information on drinking and driving: a field experiment.为饮酒者提供“了解你的极限”信息对酒后驾车的影响:一项现场实验。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Jan;72(1):79-85. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.79.
9
Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy.针对违反校园酒精政策的学生,计算机干预与面对面干预的比较
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):74-87. doi: 10.1037/a0014281.
10
Computer-based interventions for college drinking: a qualitative review.针对大学生饮酒问题的计算机辅助干预措施:一项定性综述。
Addict Behav. 2008 Aug;33(8):994-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Apr 7.