Suppr超能文献

小梁切除术中外用联合前房内利多卡因与球后麻醉的比较:前瞻性随机研究

Topical plus intracameral lidocaine versus retrobulbar anesthesia in phacotrabeculectomy: prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete F J, Gutierrez-Ortiz C

机构信息

Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Ophthalmology Department, Glaucoma Unit, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Aug;27(8):1214-20. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00883-x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of topical and retrobulbar anesthesia for phacotrabeculectomy.

SETTING

Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised 60 patients (60 eyes) having phacotrabeculectomy surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups receiving topical anesthesia plus intracameral lidocaine 1% or retrobulbar anesthesia. Patients were asked to document the discomfort they experienced during the administration of the anesthetic agent, during surgery, and postoperatively using a numeric pain scale. Complications and surgical conditions were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The retrobulbar group reported significantly more discomfort during administration of the anesthetic agent than the topical group (P < .001). The topical group reported significantly more discomfort intraoperatively (P < .01). Eyelid squeezing and eyeball movement were more common in the topical group; however, neither was a problem to the surgeon. There was no difference in surgical conditions (P = .38) or the postoperative pain scores between the 2 groups (P = .06). One patient receiving topical anesthesia developed a suprachoroidal hemorrhage intraoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical anesthesia supplemented with intracameral lidocaine was an effective alternative to retrobulbar anesthesia for phacotrabeculectomy. Although the degree of patient discomfort was significantly higher during surgery under topical anesthesia, the method avoids the pain and complications associated with a retrobulbar injection.

摘要

目的

比较表面麻醉与球后麻醉在白内障小梁切除术中的有效性和安全性。

设置

西班牙马德里拉蒙·卡哈尔医院。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了60例行白内障小梁切除术的患者(60只眼)。患者被随机分配至两组中的一组,分别接受表面麻醉加前房内注射1%利多卡因或球后麻醉。要求患者使用数字疼痛量表记录在麻醉剂给药期间、手术期间及术后所经历的不适。同时对并发症和手术情况进行评估。

结果

球后麻醉组在麻醉剂给药期间报告的不适显著多于表面麻醉组(P <.001)。表面麻醉组在术中报告的不适显著更多(P <.01)。表面麻醉组眼睑挤压和眼球运动更为常见;然而,这对手术医生来说都不是问题。两组在手术情况(P =.38)或术后疼痛评分方面无差异(P =.06)。一名接受表面麻醉的患者在术中发生脉络膜上腔出血。

结论

对于白内障小梁切除术,表面麻醉联合前房内注射利多卡因是球后麻醉的有效替代方法。虽然表面麻醉下手术期间患者不适程度明显更高,但该方法避免了与球后注射相关的疼痛和并发症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验