Yonemura Y, Endou Y, Fujimura T, Fushida S, Bandou E, Kinoshita K, Sugiyama K, Sawa T, Kim B S, Sasaki T
Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Japan.
ANZ J Surg. 2001 Sep;71(9):521-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02187.x.
At present the most reliable method for the diagnosis of peritoneal micrometastasis of gastric cancer is peritoneal wash cytology, but the sensitivity of this method is low. The aim of the present study was to verify whether carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay can enhance the sensitivity and specificity of conventional cytology, and to determine how this technique can improve the accuracy of peritoneal recurrence.
The present study included 230 patients with gastric cancer. Preoperative peritoneal wash was done by a paracentesis, followed by conventional cytology, CEA measurement, and CEA RT-PCR of recovered fluid.
The CEA RT-PCR assay yielded 40 (17%) positives, which included none of the 26 patients with benign disease. The incidence of positive cytology and CEA level in wash fluid was 19% and 15%, respectively. Logistic stepwise regression analysis revealed that lymph node status, depth of invasion, venous invasion, and the results of peritoneal cytological examination, and CEA RT-PCR assay were independently related to peritoneal recurrence. The CEA level in the wash fluid was not related to peritoneal recurrence. Peritoneal cytological examination was the most significant predictive factor for peritoneal recurrence with a sensitivity of 46%, specificity of 94% and accuracy of 73%, while the corresponding values of the CEA RT-PCR assay were 31%, 95%, and 73%. Combining cytological examination with CEA RT-PCR assay resulted in a sensitivity rate for peritoneal recurrence of 57%, an 11% improvement over that of cytology alone.
The data indicate that the use of a combination of CEA RT-PCR and cytological assay is more likely to identify patients who will develop peritoneal recurrence. This may be useful for the classification of patients for the most suitable therapeutic trials.
目前,诊断胃癌腹膜微转移最可靠的方法是腹膜冲洗细胞学检查,但该方法的敏感性较低。本研究的目的是验证癌胚抗原(CEA)逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测能否提高传统细胞学检查的敏感性和特异性,并确定该技术如何提高腹膜复发的诊断准确性。
本研究纳入了230例胃癌患者。术前通过腹腔穿刺进行腹膜冲洗,随后进行传统细胞学检查、CEA检测以及回收液的CEA RT-PCR检测。
CEA RT-PCR检测有40例(17%)呈阳性,其中26例良性疾病患者均为阴性。冲洗液中细胞学检查阳性率和CEA水平分别为19%和15%。Logistic逐步回归分析显示,淋巴结状态、浸润深度、静脉侵犯、腹膜细胞学检查结果以及CEA RT-PCR检测结果与腹膜复发独立相关。冲洗液中的CEA水平与腹膜复发无关。腹膜细胞学检查是腹膜复发最显著的预测因素,敏感性为46%,特异性为94%,准确性为73%,而CEA RT-PCR检测的相应值分别为31%、95%和73%。将细胞学检查与CEA RT-PCR检测相结合,腹膜复发的敏感性率为57%,比单独细胞学检查提高了11%。
数据表明,联合使用CEA RT-PCR和细胞学检测更有可能识别出会发生腹膜复发的患者。这可能有助于对患者进行分类,以开展最合适的治疗试验。