• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。50例术后结果。

Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases.

作者信息

Bollens R, Vanden Bossche M, Roumeguere T, Damoun A, Ekane S, Hoffmann P, Zlotta A R, Schulman C C

机构信息

Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, Route de Lennik, 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2001 Jul;40(1):65-9. doi: 10.1159/000049750.

DOI:10.1159/000049750
PMID:11528178
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

After an initial experience using transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy as described by Vallancien and Guillonneau, we developed a pure extraperitoneal approach. This approach seems more comparable to the open technique and avoid potential risks of specific complications due to the transperitoneal approach. We evaluated the perioperative parameters (blood loss, operating time, transfusion rate) and postoperative results (oncological results, continence and potency) after our first 50 cases.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Between September 1999 and September 2000, we performed 50 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. On average, patients were 63.3 years old (range 47-71), had preoperative mean PSA values of 9.14 ng/ml (1.1-23). Median Gleason score was 6 (4-10) with 2.5 (1-6) positive biopsies for a mean prostate volume of 40 cm(3) (17.5-95.0). Clinical stage was T1, T2a, T2b and T3 in 46.3, 41.5, 9.8 and 2.4% of the cases, respectively. We used a pure extraperitoneal approach and we performed a descending technique starting with the dissection at the bladder neck. The seminal vesicles dissection is comparable to the open approach.

RESULTS

42 extraperitoneal and 8 transperitoneal procedures were performed (2 in the initial experience, 3 because of previous abdominal surgery and 3 because of incidental peritoneal opening). Mean operative time was 317 min, mean blood loss 680 cm(3), transfusion rate of 13%. 1 patient/50 was converted to an open procedure. Pathological stage was pT1a, pT2a, pT2b, pT2c, pT3a and pT3b in 2.2, 8.5, 42.5, 2.2, 34 and 10.6% of cases, respectively. Positive surgical margins were observed in 22% of cases. The potency rate after neurovascular bilateral bundle preservation was 43% at 3 months (n = 7) and 67% at 6 months and (n = 6) without any further treatment. The continence rate (no pad) was 39% at 3 months and 85% at 6 months. Detectable postoperative PSA at 3 month was observed in 2 patients only. Two major complications occurred: one acute transient renal failure one uretrorectal fistula at day 20.

CONCLUSIONS

The extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy results seem comparable to transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy or open surgery. This approach is reproducible and seems to avoid the potential risks of intraperitoneal injury. Long-term follow up and comparative series are however necessary to further evaluate these new techniques.

摘要

引言

在按照瓦朗西安和吉约诺描述的方法首次尝试经腹腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后,我们开发了一种纯腹膜外入路。这种入路似乎与开放手术技术更具可比性,并且避免了经腹入路导致特定并发症的潜在风险。我们评估了前50例患者的围手术期参数(失血量、手术时间、输血率)和术后结果(肿瘤学结果、控尿和性功能)。

材料与方法

1999年9月至2000年9月期间,我们进行了50例腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。患者平均年龄63.3岁(范围47 - 71岁),术前平均前列腺特异抗原(PSA)值为9.14 ng/ml(1.1 - 23)。 Gleason评分中位数为6(4 - 10),平均活检阳性数为2.5(1 - 6)个,平均前列腺体积为40 cm³(17.5 - 95.0)。临床分期为T1、T2a、T2b和T3的病例分别占46.3%、41.5%、9.8%和2.4%。我们采用纯腹膜外入路,并采用从膀胱颈开始解剖的下行技术。精囊解剖与开放手术方法类似。

结果

共进行了42例腹膜外手术和8例经腹手术(2例为最初经验中的手术,3例因既往腹部手术,3例因意外打开腹膜)。平均手术时间为317分钟,平均失血量为680 cm³,输血率为13%。50例中有1例患者转为开放手术。病理分期为pT1a、pT2a、pT2b、pT2c、pT3a和pT3b的病例分别占2.2%、8.5%、42.5%、2.2%、34%和10.6%。22%的病例观察到手术切缘阳性。保留双侧神经血管束后,3个月时性功能恢复率为43%(n = 7),6个月时为67%(n = 6),无需进一步治疗。3个月时控尿率(无需使用尿垫)为39%,6个月时为85%。仅2例患者在术后3个月可检测到PSA。发生了2例主要并发症:1例急性短暂性肾衰竭,1例在术后第20天发生输尿管直肠瘘。

结论

腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的结果似乎与经腹腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术或开放手术相当。这种入路具有可重复性,似乎避免了腹腔内损伤的潜在风险。然而,需要长期随访和对比系列研究来进一步评估这些新技术。

相似文献

1
Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases.腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。50例术后结果。
Eur Urol. 2001 Jul;40(1):65-9. doi: 10.1159/000049750.
2
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术——加拿大一家医疗机构200例连续病例的结果
Can J Urol. 2004 Apr;11(2):2172-85.
3
Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis.采用配对分析比较经腹和腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术
Eur Urol. 2004 Sep;46(3):312-9; discussion 320. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.05.004.
4
Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures.内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术:70例手术后的初步经验
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2066-71. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067220.84015.8e.
5
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using an extraperitoneal approach: Nordwest hospital technique and initial experience in 255 cases.腹腔镜腹膜外途径根治性前列腺切除术:西北医院技术及255例初步经验
J Endourol. 2006 Jan;20(1):45-53. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.45.
6
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases.采用海尔布隆技术的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:对前180例病例的分析。
J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2101-8.
7
Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases.海尔布隆腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术。100例术后的技术与结果。
Eur Urol. 2001 Jul;40(1):54-64. doi: 10.1159/000049749.
8
Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach.机器人辅助腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术:一种替代方法。
J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):945-50; discussion 951. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00340-X.
9
Extraperitoneal standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.腹膜外标准腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术
J Endourol. 2004 Sep;18(7):605-9; discussion 609-10. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.605.
10
Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.经腹腔与腹膜外机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一项前瞻性单术者随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2015 Oct;22(10):916-21. doi: 10.1111/iju.12854. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes of Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.经腹与腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结局的比较
Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Feb 7;2023:3263286. doi: 10.1155/2023/3263286. eCollection 2023.
2
[Interactions between radical prostatovesiculectomy and diagnosis of prostate cancer : A medical-historical inventory on the occasion of 20 years of robot-assisted treatment].根治性前列腺精囊切除术与前列腺癌诊断之间的相互作用:机器人辅助治疗20周年之际的医学历史盘点
Urologe A. 2021 Aug;60(8):1039-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00120-020-01389-1.
3
Clavien System Classification of Complications Developed following Laparoscopic Urological Operations Applied in our Clinic.
我院应用的腹腔镜泌尿外科手术后并发症的Clavien系统分类
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2019 Aug 27;53(3):228-239. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.98700. eCollection 2019.
4
Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: An initial report following the first 30 cases.内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术:前30例患者的初步报告。
Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(1):48-52. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.829. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy outcome data: how should surgeon's performance be reported? A retrospective learning curve analysis of two surgeons.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的结果数据:外科医生的表现应如何报告?对两位外科医生的回顾性学习曲线分析。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2016 Jul 6;10:651. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2016.651. eCollection 2016.
6
Comparison of antegrade and retrograde laparoscopic radical prostatectomy techniques.顺行与逆行腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术技术的比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2016 Aug;32(8):403-6. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the learning curve of a low volume surgeon.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:低手术量外科医生的学习曲线
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:974276. doi: 10.1155/2013/974276. Epub 2013 Mar 3.
8
Long-term oncological and functional results of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: one surgical team's experience on 1,600 consecutive cases.经腹腔腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期肿瘤学和功能学结果:一个外科团队在 1600 例连续病例中的经验。
World J Urol. 2013 Jun;31(3):529-34. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1052-0. Epub 2013 Mar 17.
9
Bladder neck preservation during classic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - point of technique and preliminary results.经典腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中膀胱颈保留——技术要点及初步结果
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2012 Jun;7(2):89-95. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.25981. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
10
Complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--a single institute experience.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的并发症——单中心经验。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Oct;28(10):550-4. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Aug 28.