Suppr超能文献

偏好及其对健康的影响。

Preferences and understanding their effects on health.

作者信息

McPherson K, Britton A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1 7HT, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i61-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100061...

Abstract

Preference for a particular intervention may, possibly via complicated pathways, itself confer an outcome advantage which will be subsumed in unblind randomised trials as part of the measured effectiveness of the intervention. Where more attractive interventions are compared with less attractive ones, any difference could therefore be a consequence of attractiveness and not its intrinsic worth. For health promotion interventions this is clearly important, but we cannot tell how important it is for therapeutic interventions without special studies to measure or refute such effects. These are difficult to do and are complex. Until the therapeutic effects of preference itself are more clearly understood, understanding the true therapeutic effects will be compromised, at least in principle.

摘要

对某种特定干预措施的偏好可能会通过复杂的途径本身赋予一种结果优势,而这在非盲法随机试验中会被纳入该干预措施所测量的有效性的一部分。当将更具吸引力的干预措施与吸引力较小的干预措施进行比较时,因此任何差异可能是吸引力的结果而非其内在价值。对于健康促进干预措施而言,这显然很重要,但如果没有专门的研究来测量或反驳这种影响,我们无法判断其对治疗性干预措施有多重要。这些研究很难进行且很复杂。在偏好本身的治疗效果得到更清楚的理解之前,对真正治疗效果的理解将受到损害,至少在原则上是这样。

相似文献

1
Preferences and understanding their effects on health.偏好及其对健康的影响。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i61-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100061...
3
The impact of patient treatment preferences on the interpretation of randomised controlled trials.
Eur J Cancer. 1999 Oct;35(11):1598-602. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00196-3.
5
Evaluating health promotion: a tale of three errors.评估健康促进:三个错误的故事。
Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Feb;39(2-3):227-36. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00035-x.
8
Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control.风险因素、混杂因素与统计控制的错觉
Psychosom Med. 2004 Nov-Dec;66(6):868-75. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000140008.70959.41.

引用本文的文献

4
The problem with cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines.心血管疾病预防指南存在的问题。
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2012 Dec;14(6):571-4. doi: 10.1007/s11936-012-0205-6.
6
The effect of patient choice of intervention on health outcomes.患者对干预措施的选择对健康结果的影响。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Sep;29(5):679-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

4
Patient preferences in randomised trials: threat or opportunity?随机试验中的患者偏好:威胁还是机遇?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Oct;1(4):194-7. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100403.
9
Patients' preferences and randomised trials.
Lancet. 1996 Apr 20;347(9008):1119.
10
Patients' preferences and randomised trials.患者偏好与随机试验。
Lancet. 1996 Jan 20;347(8995):171-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90347-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验