Lam T, Pearson K G
University Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Sep;86(3):1321-32. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1321.
This study examined the influence of proprioceptive input from hip flexor muscles on the activity in hip flexors during the swing phase of walking in the decerebrate cat. One hindlimb was partially denervated to remove cutaneous input and afferent input from most other hindlimb muscles. Perturbations to hip movement were applied either by 1) manual resistance or assistance to swing or by 2) resistance to hip flexion using a device that blocked hip flexion but allowed leg extension. Electromyographic recordings were made from the iliopsoas (IP), sartorius, and medial gastrocnemius muscles. When the hip was manually assisted into flexion, there was a reduction in hip flexor burst activity. Conversely, when hip flexion was manually resisted or mechanically blocked during swing, the duration and amplitude of hip flexor activity was increased. We also found some specificity in the role of afferents from individual hip flexor muscles in the modulation of flexor burst activity. If the IP muscle was detached from its insertion, little change in the response to blocking flexion was observed. Specific activation of IP afferent fibers by stretching the muscle also did not greatly affect flexor activity. On the other hand, if conduction in the sartorius nerves was blocked, there was a diminished response to blocking hip flexion. The increase in duration of the flexor bursts still occurred, but this increase was consistently lower than that observed when the sartorius nerves were intact. From these results we propose that during swing, feedback from hip flexor muscle afferents, particularly those from the sartorius muscles, enhances flexor activity. In addition, if we delayed the onset of flexor activity in the contralateral hindlimb, blocking hip flexion often resulted in the prolongation of ipsilateral flexor activity for long periods of time, further revealing the reinforcing effects of flexor afferent feedback on flexor activity. This effect was not seen if conduction in the sartorius nerves was blocked. In conclusion, we have found that hip flexor activity during locomotion can be strongly modulated by modifying proprioceptive feedback from the hip flexor muscles.
本研究考察了在去大脑猫行走摆动期,髋屈肌本体感觉输入对髋屈肌活动的影响。对一侧后肢进行部分去神经支配,以去除皮肤输入以及来自大多数其他后肢肌肉的传入输入。通过以下两种方式对髋关节运动施加扰动:1)手动施加阻力或助力以实现摆动,或2)使用一种装置对髋关节屈曲施加阻力,该装置可阻止髋关节屈曲但允许腿部伸展。记录了髂腰肌(IP)、缝匠肌和腓肠肌内侧头的肌电图。当手动辅助髋关节屈曲时,髋屈肌爆发活动减少。相反,当在摆动期手动抵抗或机械阻止髋关节屈曲时,髋屈肌活动的持续时间和幅度增加。我们还发现,来自单个髋屈肌的传入神经在调节屈肌爆发活动中具有一定特异性。如果将IP肌与其附着点分离,对阻止屈曲的反应几乎没有变化。通过拉伸肌肉特异性激活IP传入纤维也不会对屈肌活动产生太大影响。另一方面,如果阻断缝匠肌神经的传导,对阻止髋关节屈曲的反应会减弱。屈肌爆发持续时间仍会增加,但这种增加始终低于缝匠肌神经完整时观察到的情况。根据这些结果,我们提出在摆动期,髋屈肌传入神经的反馈,尤其是来自缝匠肌的反馈,会增强屈肌活动。此外,如果我们延迟对侧后肢屈肌活动的起始时间,阻止髋关节屈曲通常会导致同侧屈肌活动长时间延长,进一步揭示了屈肌传入反馈对屈肌活动的增强作用。如果阻断缝匠肌神经的传导,则不会出现这种效果。总之,我们发现运动过程中髋屈肌活动可通过改变髋屈肌的本体感觉反馈而受到强烈调节。