Washburn D A
Sonny Carter Life Sciences Laboratory, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1992;24(2):248-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03203502.
Response time and accuracy are sensitive measures of overall performance but may mask underlying response strategies. For example, analysis of latency and accuracy measures produced in a computerized-maze task does not reveal whether rhesus monkeys really "solve a maze" or simply move as much as is possible toward the target, negotiating barriers through trial and error as they encounter them. Regression procedures are described for analyzing response path against several hypothetical response curves, and analyses of response path for rhesus monkeys' performance on the computerized MAZE task are presented as an illustration. The data suggest that rhesus monkeys do invoke a response strategy of solving the maze, because the observed response topography is significantly associated with the optimal path of responding. Many experimental paradigms should similarly benefit from analysis of the response paths that subjects exhibit.
反应时间和准确性是衡量整体表现的敏感指标,但可能会掩盖潜在的反应策略。例如,对计算机化迷宫任务中产生的潜伏期和准确性指标的分析,无法揭示恒河猴是真的“解决了迷宫”,还是只是尽可能地朝着目标移动,在遇到障碍物时通过试错来绕过它们。本文描述了用于分析反应路径与几种假设反应曲线的回归程序,并给出了恒河猴在计算机化迷宫任务中的反应路径分析作为示例。数据表明,恒河猴确实采用了一种解决迷宫的反应策略,因为观察到的反应地形与最优反应路径显著相关。许多实验范式同样应该从对受试者表现出的反应路径的分析中受益。