Rumbaugh D M, Richardson W K, Washburn D A, Savage-Rumbaugh E S, Hopkins W D
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30303.
J Comp Psychol. 1989 Mar;103(1):32-8. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.103.1.32.
Recent reports (Iwai, Yaginuma, & Mishkin, 1986; Yaginuma & Iwai, 1986) have supported the earlier conclusion by Meyer, Treichler, and Meyer (1965) and by Stollnitz (1965) that the efficiency of primate learning is compromised to the degree that there is spatial discontiguity between discriminanda and the locus of response. The research reported in this article calls for a reconsideration of this conclusion. Two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) easily mastered precise control of a joystick to respond to a variety of computer-generated targets despite the fact that the joystick was located 9 to 18 cm from the video screen. We hold that stimulus-response contiguity is a significant parameter of learning only to the degree that the monkey visually attends to the directional movements of its hand in order to displace discriminanda as in the Wisconsin General Test Apparatus. If, instead, attention is focused on the effects of the hand's movement rather than on the hand itself, stimulus-response contiguity is no longer a primary parameter of learning. The implications of this work for mirror-guided studies are discussed.
近期的报告(岩井、矢沼和米什金,1986年;矢沼和岩井,1986年)支持了迈耶、特雷奇勒和迈耶(1965年)以及斯托尔尼茨(1965年)早期得出的结论,即灵长类动物学习的效率会因辨别刺激物与反应位点之间存在空间不连续性而受到损害。本文所报告的研究要求重新考虑这一结论。两只恒河猴(猕猴)轻松掌握了对操纵杆的精确控制,以对各种计算机生成的目标做出反应,尽管操纵杆距离视频屏幕9至18厘米。我们认为,刺激-反应的连续性只是在猴子像在威斯康星通用测试装置中那样视觉上关注其手部的定向运动以便移动辨别刺激物的程度上才是学习的一个重要参数。相反,如果注意力集中在手部运动的效果而非手部本身,那么刺激-反应的连续性就不再是学习的一个主要参数。本文讨论了这项工作对镜像引导研究的意义。