Language Research Center, Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.
Anim Cogn. 2012 Nov;15(6):1085-94. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0532-8. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
Previous experiments have assessed planning during sequential responding to computer generated stimuli by Old World nonhuman primates including chimpanzees and rhesus macaques. However, no such assessment has been made with a New World primate species. Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are an interesting test case for assessing the distribution of cognitive processes in the Order Primates because they sometimes show proficiency in tasks also mastered by apes and Old World monkeys, but in other cases fail to match the proficiency of those other species. In two experiments, eight capuchin monkeys selected five arbitrary stimuli in distinct locations on a computer monitor in a learned sequence. In Experiment 1, shift trials occurred in which the second and third stimuli were transposed when the first stimulus was selected by the animal. In Experiment 2, mask trials occurred in which all remaining stimuli were masked after the monkey selected the first stimulus. Monkeys made more mistakes on trials in which the locations of the second and third stimuli were interchanged than on trials in which locations were not interchanged, suggesting they had already planned to select a location that no longer contained the correct stimulus. When mask trials occurred, monkeys performed at levels significantly better than chance, but their performance exceeded chance levels only for the first and the second selections on a trial. These data indicate that capuchin monkeys performed very similarly to chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys and appeared to plan their selection sequences during the computerized task, but only to a limited degree.
先前的实验已经评估了包括黑猩猩和恒河猴在内的旧大陆非人灵长类动物在对计算机生成的刺激进行顺序反应时的规划能力。然而,对于新世界灵长类动物,尚未进行此类评估。卷尾猴(Cebus apella)是评估灵长目动物认知过程分布的一个有趣的测试案例,因为它们有时在任务中表现出与类人猿和旧大陆猴子相同的熟练程度,但在其他情况下,它们的熟练程度却无法与这些其他物种相匹配。在两项实验中,八只卷尾猴在计算机显示器上的五个不同位置以特定顺序选择五个任意刺激。在实验 1 中,当动物选择第一个刺激时,第二个和第三个刺激会发生转换,即移位试验。在实验 2 中,所有其余的刺激都会在猴子选择第一个刺激后被屏蔽,即掩蔽试验。猴子在第二个和第三个刺激的位置发生交换的试验中犯的错误比位置未发生交换的试验中多,这表明它们已经计划好选择一个不再包含正确刺激的位置。当发生掩蔽试验时,猴子的表现明显优于随机水平,但它们的表现仅在试验的第一和第二次选择中超过了随机水平。这些数据表明,卷尾猴的表现与黑猩猩和恒河猴非常相似,并且似乎在计算机化任务中计划了它们的选择序列,但只是在有限的程度上。