Suppr超能文献

用于比较研究的类游戏任务:公平竞争。

Game-like tasks for comparative research: leveling the playing field.

作者信息

Washburn D A, Gulledge J P

机构信息

Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1995;27(2):235-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03204738.

Abstract

Game-like computer tasks offer many benefits for psychological research. In this paper, the usefulness of such tasks to bridge population differences (e.g., age, intelligence, species) is discussed and illustrated. A task called ALVIN was used to assess humans' and monkeys' working memory for sequences of colors with or without tones. Humans repeated longer lists than did the monkeys, and only humans benefited when the visual stimuli were accompanied by auditory cues. However, the monkeys did recall sequences at levels comparable to those reported elsewhere for children. Comparison of similarities and differences between the species is possible because the two groups were tested with exactly the same game-like paradigm.

摘要

类似游戏的计算机任务为心理学研究带来诸多益处。本文探讨并举例说明了此类任务在弥合群体差异(如年龄、智力、物种)方面的作用。一项名为ALVIN的任务被用于评估人类和猴子对有或无音调的颜色序列的工作记忆。人类能重复比猴子更长的列表,并且只有人类在视觉刺激伴有听觉线索时受益。然而,猴子回忆序列的水平与其他地方报道的儿童相当。由于两组是用完全相同的类似游戏范式进行测试的,所以可以对不同物种之间的异同进行比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验