Bowers C, Deaton J, Oser R, Prince C, Kolb M
University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1995;5(2):145-67. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0502_2.
Increasing levels of automation are being introduced into the cockpit. Yet, it is difficult to predict the impact of these automatic systems on other elements of flight, such as crew communication and the ability to arrive at an effective decision. This study attempted to clarify the relation among these variables. Forty-eight pilots were assigned to two-person crews and asked to fly a simulated mission in either automated or manual conditions using a low-fidelity simulator. The scenario was designed to require crewmembers to arrive at a collective decision based on information obtained about an evolving simulated disaster. The results indicated that the introduction of automation was not associated with better performance. However, several significant differences were observed in the communications of crews flying in the automated versus manual conditions. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for communications training for advanced technology aircraft.
驾驶舱内引入的自动化程度越来越高。然而,很难预测这些自动系统对飞行的其他要素,如机组人员沟通和做出有效决策能力的影响。本研究试图厘清这些变量之间的关系。48名飞行员被分成两人一组的机组,并要求他们使用低保真模拟器在自动或手动条件下执行模拟任务。该场景旨在要求机组人员根据有关不断演变的模拟灾难所获得的信息做出集体决策。结果表明,引入自动化与更好的表现并无关联。然而,在自动条件下飞行的机组与手动条件下飞行的机组之间的沟通方面,观察到了几个显著差异。将根据这些结果对先进技术飞机通信训练的影响进行讨论。