Suppr超能文献

自动化、任务难度与机组人员表现。

Automation, task difficulty, and aircrew performance.

作者信息

Bowers C, Thornton C, Braun C, Morgan B B, Salas E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, USA.

出版信息

Mil Psychol. 1998;10(4):259-74. doi: 10.1207/s15327876mp1004_3.

Abstract

The effects of an automated system on team processes and performance were assessed in a laboratory simulation. Two-person crews were required to fly a complex emergency-response scenario under conditions of low and high workload. These flights were completed with or without the aid of an autopilot. The results indicated that the autopilot was effective in reducing subjective workload. However, the automation was associated with improved performance on only 1 of 4 performance measures. Furthermore, it was observed that problem-solving performance was worse in the autopilot condition during the high-workload flights. Investigation of crew process data indicated that workload savings afforded by the autopilot might have been invested in more explicit coordination. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for military aviators' performance, system design, and team training.

摘要

在实验室模拟中评估了自动化系统对团队流程和绩效的影响。要求两人机组人员在低工作量和高工作量条件下执行复杂的应急响应任务。这些飞行任务在有或没有自动驾驶仪辅助的情况下完成。结果表明,自动驾驶仪在降低主观工作量方面是有效的。然而,自动化仅与4项绩效指标中的1项绩效改善相关。此外,观察到在高工作量飞行期间,自动驾驶条件下的问题解决绩效更差。对机组人员流程数据的调查表明,自动驾驶仪节省的工作量可能被投入到了更明确的协调中。从这些结果对军事飞行员绩效、系统设计和团队训练的影响方面进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验