• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家文化与驾驶舱自动化:一项多国调查的结果

National culture and flight deck automation: results of a multination survey.

作者信息

Sherman P J, Helmreich R L, Merritt A C

机构信息

The University of Texas, Austin, USA.

出版信息

Int J Aviat Psychol. 1997;7(4):311-29. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0704_4.

DOI:10.1207/s15327108ijap0704_4
PMID:11540966
Abstract

Attitudes regarding flight deck automation were surveyed in a sample of 5,879 airline pilots from 12 nations. The average difference in endorsement levels across 11 items for pilots flying automated aircraft in 12 nations was 53%, reflecting significant national differences in attitudes on all items, with the largest differences observed for preference and enthusiasm for automation. The range of agreement across nations was on average four times larger than the range of agreement across different airlines within the same nation, and roughly six times larger than the range across pilots of standard and pilots of automated aircraft. Patterns of response are described in terms of dimensions of national culture. Implications of the results for development of safety cultures and culturally sensitive training are discussed.

摘要

对来自12个国家的5879名航空公司飞行员进行了关于驾驶舱自动化态度的调查。12个国家驾驶自动化飞机的飞行员对11个项目的认可程度平均差异为53%,这反映出各国在所有项目上的态度存在显著差异,其中对自动化的偏好和热情差异最大。各国之间的认同范围平均比同一国家内不同航空公司之间的认同范围大四倍,大约比标准飞机飞行员和自动化飞机飞行员之间的认同范围大六倍。根据国家文化维度描述了回应模式。讨论了结果对安全文化发展和文化敏感培训的影响。

相似文献

1
National culture and flight deck automation: results of a multination survey.国家文化与驾驶舱自动化:一项多国调查的结果
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1997;7(4):311-29. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0704_4.
2
Research project evaluates the effect of national culture on flight crew behaviour.研究项目评估国家文化对机组人员行为的影响。
ICAO J. 1996 Oct;51(8):14-6.
3
Cockpit-cabin communication: II. Shall we tell the pilots?驾驶舱与客舱通信:II. 我们要告诉飞行员吗?
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1996;6(3):211-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0603_1.
4
Team play with a powerful and independent agent: operational experiences and automation surprises on the Airbus A-320.与强大且独立的代理进行团队协作:空客A - 320上的运行经验与自动化惊喜
Hum Factors. 1997 Dec;39(4):553-69. doi: 10.1518/001872097778667997.
5
Impact of automation on aircrew communication and decision-making performance.自动化对机组人员沟通及决策表现的影响。
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1995;5(2):145-67. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0502_2.
6
Cultural factors influencing safety need to be addressed in design and operation of technology.在技术的设计和运行中,需要考虑影响安全性的文化因素。
ICAO J. 1996 Oct;51(8):17-18, 27-28.
7
At the intersection of automation and culture.在自动化与文化的交叉点。
Earth Space Rev. 1995;4(1):11-3.
8
Eastern minds in western cockpits: meta-analysis of human factors in mishaps from three nations.西方驾驶舱中的东方思维:对三个国家事故中人为因素的荟萃分析
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007 Apr;78(4):420-5.
9
Culture in the cockpit: do Hofstede's dimensions replicate?驾驶舱文化:霍夫斯泰德的维度是否具有重复性?
J Cross Cult Psychol. 2000 May;31(3):283-301. doi: 10.1177/0022022100031003001.
10
Modern cockpit complexity challenges pilot interfaces.现代驾驶舱的复杂性对飞行员界面构成了挑战。
Aviat Week Space Technol. 1995 Jan 30;142(4):60-3.