Igaki T, Sakagami T
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Letters, Keio University, Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8345.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2001 Jun;72(2):113-20. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.72.113.
Two experiments were conducted to investigate the relation between resistance to change and preference. Four pigeons responded in concurrent chained schedules in which variable-interval (VI) 60-s schedules were arranged in the initial link. In Experiment 1, VI and fixed-interval (FI) schedules of equal mean reinforcement rates were arranged in the terminal link. Response rates were higher in the initial link leading to VI terminal link. Under the prefeeding test, the initial-link response rates leading to VI terminal link were more resistant to change than were those leading to FI terminal link, but under the extinction test there were no consistent differences between the two initial-link response rates. In Experiment 2, FI value of the terminal link was manipulated so that pigeons maintained approximately equal responding in the initial link. The two initial-link response rates showed equal resistance to change under the prefeeding and extinction tests. Thus, the data suggest that although the use of extinction as a manipulation to study resistance to change is questioned, resistance to change and preference are different measures of a single object.
进行了两项实验来研究对变化的抵抗力与偏好之间的关系。四只鸽子在并发链式程序中做出反应,其中初始链节安排了可变间隔(VI)60秒的程序。在实验1中,终端链节安排了平均强化率相等的VI和固定间隔(FI)程序。通向VI终端链节的初始链节中的反应率更高。在前喂食测试中,通向VI终端链节的初始链节反应率比通向FI终端链节的反应率更能抵抗变化,但在消退测试中,两个初始链节反应率之间没有一致的差异。在实验2中,对终端链节的FI值进行了操纵,以使鸽子在初始链节中保持大致相等的反应。在预喂食和消退测试中,两个初始链节反应率表现出相同的抗变化能力。因此,数据表明,尽管将消退用作研究对变化的抵抗力的一种操作受到质疑,但对变化的抵抗力和偏好是对单个对象的不同衡量标准。