Diringer M N, Edwards D F, Aiyagari V, Hollingsworth H
Neurology/Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2001 Sep;29(9):1792-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200109000-00023.
The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with the decision to withdraw mechanical ventilation from patients in a neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit. Specifically, the following factors were considered: the severity of the neurologic illness, the healthcare delivery system, and social factors.
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected clinical database.
Neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit of a large academic tertiary care hospital.
Patients were 2,109 nonelective admissions to the neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit who received mechanical ventilation over a period of 82 months.
None.
The average age was 56 +/- 19.7 yrs, 53% were male, and 81% were functionally normal before admission. The median Glasgow Coma Scale score was 14, the average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II severity of illness score was 13.5 +/- 8.3, and probability of death was 18.2 +/- 22.0%. Mechanical ventilation was withdrawn from 284 (13.5%). Factors that were independently associated with withdrawal of mechanical ventilation were as follows: more severe neurologic injury [admission Glasgow Coma Scale score (odds ratio 0.86/point, confidence interval 0.82-0.90), diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (odds ratio 2.44, confidence interval 1.50-3.99), or ischemic stroke (odds ratio 1.72, confidence interval 1.13-2.60)], older age (odds ratio 1.04/yr, confidence interval 1.03-1.05), and higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II probability of death (odds ratio 1.03/%, confidence interval 1.02-1.04). Mechanical ventilation was less likely to be withdrawn if patients were African-American (odds ratio 0.50, confidence interval 0.36-0.68) or had undergone surgery (odds ratio 0.44, confidence interval 0.2- 0.67). Marital status, premorbid functional status, clinical service (neurology vs. neurosurgery), attending status (private vs. academic), and type of health insurance were not associated with decisions to withdraw mechanical ventilation.
We conclude that decisions to withdraw mechanical ventilation in the neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit are based primarily on the severity of the acute neurologic condition and age but not on characteristics of the healthcare delivery system. Care is less likely to be withdrawn from African-American patients or those who had surgery.
本研究的目的是确定与神经内科/神经外科重症监护病房患者撤机决策相关的因素。具体而言,考虑了以下因素:神经系统疾病的严重程度、医疗服务提供系统和社会因素。
对前瞻性收集的临床数据库进行回顾性分析。
一家大型学术性三级护理医院的神经内科/神经外科重症监护病房。
2109例非选择性入住神经内科/神经外科重症监护病房的患者,在82个月的时间里接受了机械通气。
无。
平均年龄为56±19.7岁,53%为男性,81%在入院前功能正常。格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分中位数为14分,急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II平均疾病严重程度评分为13.5±8.3分,死亡概率为18.2±22.0%。284例(13.5%)患者撤机。与撤机独立相关的因素如下:更严重的神经损伤[入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(比值比0.86/分,置信区间0.82 - 0.90)、蛛网膜下腔出血诊断(比值比2.44,置信区间1.50 - 3.99)或缺血性中风(比值比1.72,置信区间1.13 - 2.60)]、年龄较大(比值比1.04/岁,置信区间1.03 - 1.05)以及急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II较高的死亡概率(比值比1.03/%,置信区间1.02 - 1.04)。如果患者是非裔美国人(比值比0.50,置信区间0.36 - 0.68)或接受过手术(比值比0.44,置信区间0.2 - 0.67),则撤机的可能性较小。婚姻状况、病前功能状态、临床科室(神经内科与神经外科)、主治医生身份(私立与学术)以及医疗保险类型与撤机决策无关。
我们得出结论,神经内科/神经外科重症监护病房的撤机决策主要基于急性神经病情的严重程度和年龄,而非医疗服务提供系统的特征。非裔美国患者或接受过手术的患者撤机的可能性较小。