Suppr超能文献

缺血性中风的溶栓治疗——综述。第一部分——静脉溶栓

Thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke--a review. Part I--Intravenous thrombolysis.

作者信息

Schellinger P D, Fiebach J B, Mohr A, Ringleb P A, Jansen O, Hacke W

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2001 Sep;29(9):1812-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200109000-00027.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke was implemented into clinical routine 4 yrs ago. Unfortunately, at present <2% of eligible patients receive thrombolytic therapy. We present an overview of all hitherto completed trials of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for carotid artery stroke including recommendations for therapy and diagnostic procedures and their impact on patient selection and meta-analyses.

DATA SOURCES

We performed an extensive literature search not only to identify the larger and well-known randomized trials but also to identify smaller pilot studies and case series. Trials included in this review, among others, are the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) study, European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study I and II, and Alteplase Thrombolysis for Acute Noninterventional Therapy in Ischemic Stroke (ATLANTIS) A and B and two large meta-analyses, including the Cochrane Library report.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator has demonstrated a significant benefit and has proven to be safe for patients who can be treated within 3-6 hrs after symptom onset. This benefit is at the cost of an increased rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage without a significant effect on overall mortality. In general, the benefit of thrombolysis decreases and the risks increase with progressing time after symptom onset. Presently, thrombolytic therapy is still underutilized because of problems with clinical and time criteria, and lack of public and professional education to regard stroke as a treatable emergency. If applied more widely, thrombolytic therapy may result in profound cost savings in health care and reduction of long-term disability of stroke patients.

摘要

目的

急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗于4年前被纳入临床常规治疗。遗憾的是,目前 eligible patients receive thrombolytic therapy. 我们对迄今为止所有已完成的颈动脉卒中静脉溶栓治疗试验进行了综述,包括治疗和诊断程序的建议及其对患者选择和荟萃分析的影响。

数据来源

我们进行了广泛的文献检索,不仅是为了识别较大且知名的随机试验,也是为了识别较小的试点研究和病例系列。本综述纳入的试验包括美国国立神经疾病与卒中研究所(NINDS)研究、欧洲急性卒中协作研究I和II、急性缺血性卒中阿替普酶溶栓非介入治疗(ATLANTIS)A和B以及两项大型荟萃分析,包括Cochrane图书馆报告。

结论

重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂静脉溶栓治疗已显示出显著益处,且已证明对症状发作后3 - 6小时内可治疗的患者是安全的。这种益处是以症状性颅内出血发生率增加为代价的,对总体死亡率没有显著影响。一般来说,随着症状发作后时间的推移,溶栓的益处降低,风险增加。目前,由于临床和时间标准方面的问题,以及缺乏将卒中视为可治疗急症的公众和专业教育,溶栓治疗仍未得到充分利用。如果更广泛地应用,溶栓治疗可能会在医疗保健方面大幅节省成本,并降低卒中患者的长期残疾率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验