Nefedova V V, Korenberg E I, Nesterenko L N, Gintsburg A L, Kovalevskiĭ Iu V, Gorelova N B
Parazitologiia. 2001 Jan-Feb;35(1):3-8.
Indication of Borrelia (B. burgdorferi sensu lato) in 205 adult unfed I. persulcatus ticks from a natural focus was carried out simultaneously by methods of PCR and dark-field microscopy of vital preparations. PCR method revealed Borrelia prevalence in considerable number of ticks, in which Borrelia were not found by microscopy of 250 microscopic fields in a preparation from each individual tick. At the same time, PCR method didn't give positive results for approximately 8% of ticks, which contained rather high concentration of Borrelia (more than 10 per 100 microscopic fields). In general, PCR method doesn't have advantages in comparison with a microscopy of vital preparations for study the Borrelia prevalence in ticks.
采用PCR方法和活体标本暗视野显微镜检查法,对来自自然疫源地的205只未进食的成年全沟硬蜱同时进行伯氏疏螺旋体(广义伯氏疏螺旋体)检测。PCR方法显示相当数量的蜱中存在伯氏疏螺旋体,而在对每只蜱制作的标本进行250个视野的显微镜检查时却未发现伯氏疏螺旋体。同时,对于约8%的蜱,PCR方法未得出阳性结果,而这些蜱中伯氏疏螺旋体浓度相当高(每100个视野中超过10个)。总体而言,在研究蜱中伯氏疏螺旋体感染率方面,与活体标本显微镜检查相比,PCR方法并无优势。