Pae E K, McKenna G A, Sheehan T J, Garcia R, Kuhlberg A, Nanda R
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington 60030, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Sep;120(3):254-62. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.116825.
To assess the role of lateral cephalometric films in the evaluation of orthodontic patients, 16 certified orthodontists examined 80 sets of dental casts and lateral cephalograms. The patients included 5 subgroups: Class I with mild crowding, Class II Division 2, Class III, open bites, and bimaxillary protrusion. A 5-point Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess the degree of severity and difficulty of each case. Severity was defined as the degree of deviation from ideal occlusion, while difficulty was defined as the probability of attaining an ideal occlusion when all treatment options were available. The examiner then chose one or more of the following treatment options: growth modification, extraction, nonextraction, and surgery. All examiners scored the degree of severity and difficulty of each case with casts only at Time 1 (T1), then with casts and cephalograms at Time 2 (T2). The observed ratings from the Visual Analogue Scale were scored by using the Rasch model, which transforms the nonlinear ordinal ratings to a linear interval scale. Intersubgroup differences and differences between T1 and T2 difficulty and severity were assessed by using a 5 x 2 repeated measures analysis of variance. A paired t test examined the amount and direction of the differences between T1 and T2 of each subgroup. Multiple contingency tables were used to compare treatment option changes between all subgroups at each time. Severity and difficulty scores highly correlated. Analysis of variance showed significant differences among subgroups for both severity and difficulty; however, there were significant time differences for severity only. Paired t tests revealed a small increase in severity for the bimaxillary protrusive group and small but significant decreases for the subgroups Class II Division 2 and Class III when cephalograms were added. The multicontingency table analysis demonstrated that a significant number of examiners did change their treatment options at T2 for bimaxillary protrusive, nonextraction, and Class II Division 2 patients. It was concluded that lateral cephalometric films showed a significant influence on a clinician's determination on severity of some types of orthodontic malocclusions.
为评估头颅侧位片在正畸患者评估中的作用,16名认证正畸医生检查了80套牙模和头颅侧位片。患者包括5个亚组:轻度拥挤的安氏I类、安氏II类2分类、安氏III类、开(牙合)以及双颌前突。采用5点视觉模拟量表评估每个病例的严重程度和难度。严重程度定义为与理想咬合的偏离程度,而难度定义为在所有治疗方案都可行时达到理想咬合的可能性。然后,检查者选择以下一种或多种治疗方案:生长改良、拔牙、不拔牙以及手术。所有检查者仅在时间1(T1)时根据牙模对每个病例的严重程度和难度进行评分,然后在时间2(T2)时根据牙模和头颅侧位片进行评分。使用Rasch模型对视觉模拟量表的观察评分进行计分,该模型将非线性有序评分转换为线性区间量表。采用5×2重复测量方差分析评估亚组间差异以及T1和T2时难度与严重程度的差异。配对t检验检查每个亚组T1和T2之间差异的大小和方向。使用多重列联表比较各时间所有亚组之间的治疗方案变化。严重程度和难度评分高度相关。方差分析显示亚组间在严重程度和难度上均存在显著差异;然而,仅在严重程度上存在显著的时间差异。配对t检验显示,添加头颅侧位片后,双颌前突组的严重程度略有增加,安氏II类2分类和安氏III类亚组的严重程度有小幅但显著的降低。多重列联表分析表明,相当数量的检查者在T2时确实改变了双颌前突、不拔牙以及安氏II类2分类患者的治疗方案。研究得出结论,头颅侧位片对临床医生确定某些类型正畸错(牙合)畸形的严重程度有显著影响。