Department of Dentistry - Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Knowledge Institute of the Federation of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Radiol Med. 2021 Jan;126(1):72-82. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01219-6. Epub 2020 May 27.
Radiographs are considered essential in orthodontics. However, their diagnostic value and indications for use are still uncertain, while exposure to radiation carries health risks. This study aimed to report on the development of a clinical practice guideline on orthodontic radiology.
A Guideline Development Taskforce was set up. The GRADE methodology was used for development and the RIGHT Statement for reporting of the guideline. We systematically reviewed articles to address the main clinical question: how different types of radiographs contribute to orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and post-treatment outcome evaluation. After a literature search and data extraction, we formulated conclusions and assessed the strength of the evidence according to the GRADE method. Both literature conclusions and the most important considerations, such as patient preferences, organizational matters and expert opinions were taken into account to finally issue recommendations.
7 clinical questions focused on orthopantomograms, lateral cephalograms, hand-wrist radiographs, peri-apical radiographs, bitewings, antero-occlusal radiographs, and cone-beam computer tomographic imaging. The literature search lead to 484 unique studies, of which 17 were included in the analysis. The strength of evidence of the conclusions was graded low or very low. We formulated considerations and took them into account when issuing the 13 clinical recommendations to address the clinical questions.
There was a considerable lack of scientific evidence on this topic. Nonetheless, this guideline provides clinicians with a tool for decision-making regarding radiographic records while enhancing patient radiation protection. More research of higher quality is recommended for a future update.
X 光片在正畸学中被认为是必不可少的。然而,其诊断价值和使用指征仍不确定,而辐射暴露会带来健康风险。本研究旨在报告正畸放射学临床实践指南的制定情况。
成立了一个指南制定工作组。该指南的制定采用了 GRADE 方法学和 RIGHT 声明。我们系统地检索了文献,以解决主要临床问题:不同类型的 X 光片如何有助于正畸诊断、治疗计划和治疗后结果评估。在进行文献检索和数据提取后,我们根据 GRADE 方法制定结论并评估证据强度。文献结论以及最重要的考虑因素,如患者偏好、组织问题和专家意见,都被考虑在内,最终提出建议。
7 个临床问题集中在全景 X 光片、侧位头颅 X 光片、手腕 X 光片、根尖周 X 光片、咬翼片、前牙合 X 光片和锥形束计算机断层扫描成像上。文献检索共得到 484 项独特的研究,其中 17 项被纳入分析。结论的证据强度被评为低或极低。我们制定了考虑因素,并在提出 13 项临床建议以解决临床问题时考虑了这些因素。
关于这个主题的科学证据相当缺乏。尽管如此,本指南为临床医生提供了决策工具,同时增强了患者的辐射防护。建议进行更高质量的研究,以备未来更新。