Stalpers Mattijs J P, Booij Johan W, Bronkhorst Ewald M, Kuijpers-Jagtman Anne Marie, Katsaros Christos
Department of Orthodontics and Oral Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.034.
Our objectives were to assess treatment outcomes in Class II Division 1 patients who were treated orthodontically with extraction of the maxillary first permanent molars and to describe the changes in their facial profiles.
This was a prospective, longitudinal, 1-group outcome analysis in a private practice, with outcome evaluation by independent observers at an academic clinic. One hundred consecutively treated patients were enrolled prospectively and treated by 1 orthodontist. The inclusion criteria were white, Class II Division 1, sagittal overjet of > or =4 mm, extraction of maxillary first permanent molars, no missing teeth or agenesis, maxillary third molars present, and 1-stage full fixed appliance treatment. Standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs were made before and after active treatment. Occlusal outcome was scored on dental casts by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment casts with the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Backward regression analysis was used to explain the soft-tissue changes on the basis of dental changes and the soft-tissue characteristics.
The mean reduction in weighted PAR score was 89.9% (SD, 0.9). During treatment, the lower lip retruded 1.6 mm (SD, 1.7) relative to the esthetic line. The nasolabial angle became 2.1 degrees (SD, 7.0) more obtuse during treatment. Overjet reduction and initial upper lip thickness could explain 15% of the variation in upper lip position. The changes in the position of the mandibular incisor relative to the Point A-pogonion line and initial lower lip thickness could explain 23% of the variation of lower lip position.
Orthodontic treatment involving extraction of the maxillary first permanent molars has a good treatment outcome. Extraction of the maxillary first permanent molars has only a small effect on the soft-tissue profile.
我们的目的是评估拔除上颌第一恒磨牙进行正畸治疗的安氏II类1分类患者的治疗效果,并描述其面部轮廓的变化。
这是一项在私人诊所进行的前瞻性、纵向、单组结果分析,由学术诊所的独立观察者进行结果评估。前瞻性纳入100例连续接受治疗的患者,并由1名正畸医生进行治疗。纳入标准为白人、安氏II类1分类、矢状覆盖≥4 mm、拔除上颌第一恒磨牙、无牙齿缺失或先天性缺失、存在上颌第三磨牙,以及采用1期全固定矫治器治疗。在积极治疗前后拍摄标准化的头颅侧位片。通过将治疗前和治疗后的模型与同侪评估评分(PAR)指数进行比较,在模型上对咬合结果进行评分。采用向后回归分析,根据牙齿变化和软组织特征来解释软组织变化。
加权PAR评分的平均降低率为89.9%(标准差,0.9)。治疗期间,下唇相对于审美线后缩1.6 mm(标准差,1.7)。治疗期间鼻唇角变钝2.1度(标准差,7.0)。覆盖减小和初始上唇厚度可解释上唇位置变化的15%。下颌切牙相对于A点-颏前点连线的位置变化和初始下唇厚度可解释下唇位置变化的23%。
涉及拔除上颌第一恒磨牙的正畸治疗具有良好的治疗效果。拔除上颌第一恒磨牙对软组织轮廓的影响较小。