Stronks K, Ravelli A C, Reijneveld S A
Department of Social Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Oct;55(10):701-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.10.701.
This paper examines whether equal utilisation of health care services for first generation immigrant groups has been achieved in the Netherlands.
Survey data were linked to an insurance register concerning people aged 16-64. Ethnic differences in the use of a broad range of health care services were examined in this group, with and without adjustment for health status and socioeconomic status, using logistic regression.
Publicly insured population in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
1422 people from the indigenous population, and 378 people from the four largest immigrant groups in the Netherlands-that is, the Surinamese, the Netherlands Antilleans, and the Turkish and Moroccan.
General practitioner service use (past two months), prescription drug use (past three months), outpatient specialist contact (past two months), hospital admission (past year), physiotherapist contact (past two months) and contact with other paramedics (past year).
Ethnicity was found to be associated with the use of health care after controlling for health status as an indicator for need. The use of general practitioner care and the use of prescribed drugs was increased among people from Surinam, Turkey and Morocco as compared with the indigenous population. Compared with the indigenous group with corresponding health status, the use of all other more specialised services was relatively low among Turkish and Moroccan people. Among the Surinamese population, the use of more specialised care was highly similar to that found in the Dutch population after differences in need were controlled for. Among people from the Netherlands Antilles, we observed a relatively high use of hospital services in combination with underuse of general practitioner services. The lower socioeconomic status of immigrant groups explained most of the increased use of the general practitioner and prescribed drugs, but could not account for the lower use of the more specialised services.
The results indicate that the utilisation of more specialised health care is lower for immigrant groups in the Netherlands, particularly for Turkish and Moroccan people and to a lesser extent, people from the Netherlands Antilles. Although underuse of more specialised services is also present among the lower socioeconomic groups in the Netherlands, the analyses indicate that this only partly explains the lower utilisation of these services among immigrant groups. This suggests that ethnic background in itself may account for patterns of consumption, potentially because of limited access.
本文研究荷兰是否实现了第一代移民群体对医疗保健服务的平等利用。
将调查数据与一份关于16 - 64岁人群的保险登记册相链接。使用逻辑回归分析了该群体在使用广泛医疗保健服务方面的种族差异,同时对健康状况和社会经济状况进行了调整和未调整的情况。
荷兰阿姆斯特丹的公共保险人群。
1422名原住民,以及来自荷兰四个最大移民群体的378人,即苏里南人、荷属安的列斯群岛人、土耳其人和摩洛哥人。
全科医生服务使用情况(过去两个月)、处方药使用情况(过去三个月)、门诊专科就诊情况(过去两个月)、住院情况(过去一年)、物理治疗师就诊情况(过去两个月)以及与其他医护人员的接触情况(过去一年)。
在将健康状况作为需求指标进行控制后,发现种族与医疗保健服务的使用有关。与原住民相比,苏里南、土耳其和摩洛哥人群中全科医生护理和处方药的使用有所增加。与具有相应健康状况的原住民群体相比,土耳其和摩洛哥人群中所有其他更专业服务的使用相对较低。在苏里南人群中,在控制需求差异后,更专业护理的使用与荷兰人群中发现的情况高度相似。在荷属安的列斯群岛人群中,我们观察到医院服务的使用相对较高,同时全科医生服务的使用不足。移民群体较低的社会经济地位解释了全科医生和处方药使用增加的大部分原因,但无法解释更专业服务使用较低的情况。
结果表明,荷兰移民群体对更专业医疗保健的利用较低,尤其是土耳其和摩洛哥人群,荷属安的列斯群岛人群的情况较轻。尽管荷兰社会经济地位较低的群体中也存在对更专业服务使用不足的情况,但分析表明这只是部分解释了移民群体中这些服务利用较低的原因。这表明种族背景本身可能导致消费模式的差异,可能是由于获得服务的机会有限。