Suppr超能文献

作为护理教育成果的批判性思维评估中一种替代方法的开发。

The development of an alternative method in the assessment of critical thinking as an outcome of nursing education.

作者信息

Daly W M

机构信息

Secondary Care Nursing Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall, UK.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2001 Oct;36(1):120-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01949.x.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Critical thinking is currently a highly valued educational outcome throughout the educational spectrum, but particularly so in relation to higher and professional education. Nursing education worldwide is also embracing the construct critical thinking as a desirable educational outcome, to the extent that some commentators refer to the importance of critical thinking in nursing as a given. The body of evidence relating to the impact that nursing education has upon the development of critical thinking is currently inconclusive. Many commentators claim that this may be because the instruments used in many studies are not sufficiently domain-specific.

STUDY AIMS

The primary purpose of this descriptive-illuminative study was to explore and develop an alternative domain-specific method for identifying critical thinking in student nurses' reasoning processes.

DESIGN

A longitudinal multimethod design incorporating across-method triangulation has been utilized for this purpose. Data collection from a group of student nurses involved the combination of the Watson and Glaser (1991) critical thinking appraisal test and a researcher developed think aloud technique incorporating a videotaped client simulation, a cognitive task and stimulated recall strategy.

FINDINGS

Findings indicate no significant differences in pre and postprogramme Watson-Glaser mean scores. With regard to the think aloud evidence the sample consistently displayed evidence of reasoning that reflected an absolutist epistemology portraying limited evidence of critical thinking. In instances where more complex reasoning was demonstrated there was evidence to suggest that metacognitive strategies may contribute to this phenomenon.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings make a further contribution to the assessment of critical thinking and raise interesting challenges to future curriculum development in nursing education, assessment of learning and nursing practice.

摘要

理论依据

批判性思维目前在整个教育领域都是备受重视的教育成果,在高等教育和专业教育中尤为如此。全球护理教育也将批判性思维这一概念视为理想的教育成果,以至于一些评论家认为批判性思维在护理中的重要性是不言而喻的。目前,关于护理教育对批判性思维发展的影响的证据尚无定论。许多评论家声称,这可能是因为许多研究中使用的工具不够针对特定领域。

研究目的

这项描述性阐释性研究的主要目的是探索并开发一种针对特定领域的替代方法,用于识别护生推理过程中的批判性思维。

设计

为此采用了一种纵向多方法设计,包括跨方法三角验证。对一组护生的数据收集,结合了沃森-格拉泽(1991)批判性思维评估测试,以及研究人员开发的出声思考技术,该技术包括录像的患者模拟、认知任务和刺激回忆策略。

研究结果

结果表明,课程前后沃森-格拉泽平均分数没有显著差异。关于出声思考的证据,样本始终显示出反映绝对主义认识论的推理证据,批判性思维的证据有限。在展示更复杂推理的情况下,有证据表明元认知策略可能促成了这一现象。

结论

这些发现为批判性思维的评估做出了进一步贡献,并对护理教育未来的课程开发、学习评估和护理实践提出了有趣的挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验