• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用估计方程法分析加长驾驶室皮卡的死亡事故。

Analysis of fatalities in extended cab pickup trucks using an estimating equation method.

作者信息

Anderson C L, Agran P, Winn D

机构信息

University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.

出版信息

Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2000;44:67-73.

PMID:11558103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3217377/
Abstract

We compared the fatality risk for occupants of rear passenger seats in extended cab and crew cab pickup trucks to the fatality risk for front seat occupants of the same vehicles using the (US) Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) for 1982-1997. A 10-digit truncated vehicle identification number was used to classify the pickup trucks. The data were analyzed with an estimating equation for data having few observations per stratum. We identified 549 extended cab pickup trucks with one or more occupants of rear passenger seats and one or more occupant deaths. Occupants of rear passenger seats had a fatality risk 43% lower than front seat occupants (95% confidence interval 32% to 52%), controlling for age, sex, and restraint use. Occupants of rear seats of extended cabs in compact pickup trucks did not experience any higher fatality risk (relative to front-seat occupants of the same vehicles) than rear seat occupants of extended cabs in full-size pickup trucks and large 4-door crew cabs.

摘要

我们使用1982 - 1997年的(美国)死亡分析报告系统(FARS),比较了双排座和四门双排座皮卡后乘客座位乘客的死亡风险与同一车辆前排座位乘客的死亡风险。使用10位截断的车辆识别号对皮卡进行分类。采用针对每层观测值较少的数据的估计方程对数据进行分析。我们识别出549辆双排座皮卡,这些皮卡有一名或多名后乘客座位乘客且发生了一例或多例乘客死亡。在控制年龄、性别和安全带使用情况后,后乘客座位乘客的死亡风险比前排座位乘客低43%(95%置信区间为32%至52%)。紧凑型皮卡双排座的后排座位乘客,与全尺寸皮卡和大型四门双排座皮卡双排座的后排座位乘客相比,(相对于同一车辆的前排座位乘客)并未面临更高的死亡风险。

相似文献

1
Analysis of fatalities in extended cab pickup trucks using an estimating equation method.使用估计方程法分析加长驾驶室皮卡的死亡事故。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2000;44:67-73.
2
Risk of injury to child passengers in compact extended-cab pickup trucks.紧凑型双排座皮卡中儿童乘客受伤的风险。
JAMA. 2002 Mar 6;287(9):1147-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.9.1147.
3
Fatalities to occupants of cargo areas of pickup trucks.皮卡货厢内乘客的死亡情况。
Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Jul;32(4):533-40. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00075-5.
4
Rear seat safety: Variation in protection by occupant, crash and vehicle characteristics.后排座椅安全:乘客、碰撞和车辆特征对保护效果的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jul;80:185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
5
Fatal side impact crash scenarios for rear seat and seat belt-restrained occupants from vulnerable populations.脆弱人群中后排座椅和安全带约束乘客的致命侧面碰撞场景。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S50-S56. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1641598. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
6
Children in pickup trucks. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention.
Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4):857-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.4.857.
7
Update on the effectiveness of high retention seats in preventing fatal injury in rear impacts.关于高保持力座椅在后碰撞中预防致命伤害的有效性的最新进展。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(2):154-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.925109.
8
Method to evaluate the effect of safety belt use by rear seat passengers on the injury severity of front seat occupants.评估后排乘客使用安全带对前排乘客受伤严重程度影响的方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jan;37(1):5-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.05.003.
9
Potential benefits of underride guards in large truck side crashes.大型卡车侧面碰撞中防钻入装置的潜在好处。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(6):592-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.666595.
10
Protection of rear seat occupants in frontal crashes, controlling for occupant and crash characteristics.在正面碰撞中对后排乘客的保护,控制乘客和碰撞特征。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2009 Nov;53:75-91. doi: 10.4271/2009-22-0003.

本文引用的文献

1
Fatalities to occupants of cargo areas of pickup trucks.皮卡货厢内乘客的死亡情况。
Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Jul;32(4):533-40. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00075-5.
2
The effects of seat belts on injury severity of front and rear seat occupants in the same frontal crash.安全带对同一正面碰撞中前排和后排乘客受伤严重程度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 1995 Dec;27(6):835-8. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(95)00021-6.
3
Relative risk, risk difference and rate difference models for sparse stratified data: a pseudo likelihood approach.稀疏分层数据的相对风险、风险差异和率差模型:一种拟似然方法。
Stat Med. 1993 Dec 30;12(24):2285-303. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780122406.
4
Driver injury and fatality risk in two-car crashes versus mass ratio inferred using Newtonian mechanics.使用牛顿力学推断两车碰撞中驾驶员受伤和死亡风险与质量比的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 1994 Oct;26(5):609-16. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90022-1.
5
Injuries to occupants in cargo areas of pickup trucks.皮卡货厢内乘客的受伤情况。
West J Med. 1994 Nov;161(5):479-82.
6
Double pair comparison--a new method to determine how occupant characteristics affect fatality risk in traffic crashes.双配对比较——一种确定驾乘人员特征如何影响交通事故中死亡风险的新方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 1986 Jun;18(3):217-27. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(86)90006-0.
7
Seating position in cars and fatality risk.汽车座位位置与死亡风险
Am J Public Health. 1988 Nov;78(11):1456-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.11.1456.
8
Pediatric injuries in the back of pickup trucks.皮卡货车后部的儿童损伤。
JAMA. 1990 Aug 8;264(6):712-6.
9
Fatal incidents involving pickup trucks in Alabama.阿拉巴马州涉及皮卡的致命事故。
South Med J. 1991 Mar;84(3):349-54. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199103000-00011.
10
Falls and ejections from pickup trucks.从皮卡车上跌落和被弹出。
J Trauma. 1992 Apr;32(4):468-71; discussion 471-2.