Brandon T H
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33617, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):64S-68S.
This article reviews behavioral treatments (broadly defined) for tobacco use, discusses cessation treatments for cancer patients, and predicts the future direction of behavioral interventions. During the past decade, progress in behavioral treatments for tobacco use has not kept pace with progress made in the development of pharmacotherapies. Nevertheless, the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of behavioral treatments compare favorably with the pharmacotherapies. Intensive behavioral interventions with empirical support are reviewed, and the difficulty of attracting smokers to intensive smoking clinics is discussed. Because there has been little research on tobacco cessation interventions designed specifically for cancer patients, clinicians should follow the Five A's suggested in the recent Clinical Practice Guidelines: Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange. The future of behavioral treatments will likely emphasize both minimal interventions (via telephone, Internet, and written materials) designed for broad impact and intensive interventions targeted to particular subgroups of smokers with the need and motivation for them (eg, the heavily nicotine-dependent, pregnant women, depression-prone smokers, and medical patients). A blurring of the distinctions between behavioral interventions, pharmacotherapies, and community-oriented approaches is also likely as multidimensional cessation strategies are developed.
本文回顾了针对烟草使用的行为治疗(广义定义),讨论了癌症患者的戒烟治疗,并预测了行为干预的未来方向。在过去十年中,烟草使用行为治疗的进展未能跟上药物治疗发展的步伐。然而,行为治疗的疗效和成本效益与药物治疗相比具有优势。本文回顾了有实证支持的强化行为干预措施,并讨论了吸引吸烟者前往强化戒烟诊所的困难。由于专门针对癌症患者设计的戒烟干预研究较少,临床医生应遵循近期临床实践指南中建议的“五个A”:询问、建议、评估、协助和安排。行为治疗的未来可能会强调两种干预方式,一种是为产生广泛影响而设计的最小化干预(通过电话、互联网和书面材料),另一种是针对有需求和动机的特定吸烟者亚组(例如,尼古丁高度依赖者、孕妇、易患抑郁症的吸烟者和医疗患者)的强化干预。随着多维戒烟策略的发展,行为干预、药物治疗和社区导向方法之间的区别也可能变得模糊。