Lichtner R B, Rotgeri A, Bunte T, Buchmann B, Hoffmann J, Schwede W, Skuballa W, Klar U
Research Laboratories of Schering AG, Müllerstrasse 178, 13342 Berlin, Germany.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11743-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.171023398. Epub 2001 Sep 18.
Epothilones are a new class of natural and potent antineoplastic agents that stabilize microtubules. Although 12,13-epoxide derivatives are potent antiproliferative agents, the activities of the corresponding 12,13-olefin analogs are significantly decreased. These data were confirmed for two new analogs, 6-propyl-EpoB (pEB) and 6-propyl-EpoD (pED), in comparison with the natural compounds EpoB/EpoD, by using human A431, MCF7, and MDR1-overexpressing NCI/Adr cells. By using tritiated pEB/pED, compound uptake, release, and nuclear accumulation were investigated in A431 and NCI/Adr cells. In these cells, epothilones can principally be recognized and exported by Verapamil-sensitive efflux pumps, which are not identical to MDR1. The degree of export depends on the structure, olefin vs. epoxide-analog, and also on the intracellular drug concentration. The accumulation of pED used at 3.5 or 70 nM, respectively, was increased in the presence of 10 microM Verapamil in both cell lines 2- to 8-fold. In contrast, the intracellular levels of pEB were affected by Verapamil only at 3.5 nM pEB in NCI/Adr (2-fold) and not in A431 cells. In addition, strong nuclear accumulation was observed for pEB (40-50%) but not paclitaxel or pED (5-15%) in both cell lines. Our study suggests that differences in growth inhibitory efficacy between epoxide and olefin analogs may be based on different mechanisms of drug accumulation and subcellular distribution.
埃坡霉素是一类新型的、具有稳定微管作用的天然强效抗肿瘤药物。尽管12,13 - 环氧衍生物是强效的抗增殖剂,但相应的12,13 - 烯烃类似物的活性却显著降低。通过使用人A431、MCF7和过表达MDR1的NCI/Adr细胞,与天然化合物埃坡霉素B/埃坡霉素D相比,对两种新的类似物6 - 丙基 - 埃坡霉素B(pEB)和6 - 丙基 - 埃坡霉素D(pED)的这些数据进行了验证。通过使用氚标记的pEB/pED,研究了A431和NCI/Adr细胞对化合物的摄取、释放及核内蓄积情况。在这些细胞中,埃坡霉素主要可被维拉帕米敏感的外排泵识别并转运出去,这些外排泵与MDR1不同。外排程度取决于结构,即烯烃与环氧类似物,还取决于细胞内药物浓度。在两种细胞系中,当存在10 μM维拉帕米时,分别以3.5 nM或70 nM使用的pED的蓄积量增加了2至8倍。相比之下,仅在NCI/Adr细胞中,当pEB为3.5 nM时,维拉帕米才会影响其细胞内水平(增加2倍),而在A431细胞中则无影响。此外,在两种细胞系中均观察到pEB有强烈的核内蓄积(40 - 50%),而紫杉醇或pED则没有(5 - 15%)。我们的研究表明,环氧类似物和烯烃类似物之间生长抑制效力的差异可能基于药物蓄积和亚细胞分布的不同机制。