Suppr超能文献

社区和学术界能否在公共卫生研究方面开展合作?来自底特律一个基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的评估结果。

Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit.

作者信息

Lantz P M, Viruell-Fuentes E, Israel B A, Softley D, Guzman R

机构信息

The University of Michigan School of Public Health, 109 Observatory Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.

出版信息

J Urban Health. 2001 Sep;78(3):495-507. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.495.

Abstract

This article reports the results of a formative evaluation of the first 4 years of the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center (URC), a community-based participatory research partnership that was founded in 1995 with core funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Several organizations are members of this partnership, including a university, six community-based organizations, a city health department, a health care system, and CDC. The Detroit URC is a strong partnership that has accomplished many of its goals, including the receipt of over $11 million in funding for 12 community-based participatory research projects during its initial 4 years. Detroit URC Board members identified a number of facilitating factors for their growth and achievements, such as (1) developing a sound infrastructure and set of processes for making decisions and working together, (2) building trust among partners, (3) garnering committed and active leadership from community partners, and (4) receiving support from CDC. Board members also identified a number of ongoing challenges, including organizational constraints, time pressures, and balancing community interests in interventions and academic research needs. Overall, the Detroit URC represents a partnership approach to identifying community health concerns and implementing potential solutions.

摘要

本文报告了底特律社区-学术城市研究中心(URC)头四年形成性评估的结果。该研究中心是一个基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系,于1995年在疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的核心资助下成立。几个组织是这个伙伴关系的成员,包括一所大学、六个社区组织、一个城市卫生部门、一个医疗保健系统和疾病控制与预防中心。底特律URC是一个强大的伙伴关系,已经实现了许多目标,包括在最初四年中为12个基于社区的参与性研究项目获得了超过1100万美元的资金。底特律URC董事会成员确定了一些促进其发展和成就的因素,例如:(1)建立健全的基础设施以及决策和合作流程;(2)在合作伙伴之间建立信任;(3)获得社区合作伙伴坚定而积极的领导;(4)得到疾病控制与预防中心的支持。董事会成员还确定了一些持续存在的挑战,包括组织限制、时间压力以及平衡社区在干预措施方面的利益和学术研究需求。总体而言,底特律URC代表了一种通过伙伴关系来识别社区健康问题并实施潜在解决方案的方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Establishing LA VIDA: a community-based partnership to prevent intimate violence against Latina women.
Health Educ Behav. 1999 Dec;26(6):821-40. doi: 10.1177/109019819902600606.
8
Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion.社区预防与健康促进联盟
Health Educ Res. 1993 Sep;8(3):315-30. doi: 10.1093/her/8.3.315.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验